Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1115983
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T03:14:13+00:00 2026-05-17T03:14:13+00:00

Under Linux, C++, and GCC, can I get a physical address for a given

  • 0

Under Linux, C++, and GCC, can I get a physical address for a given virtual address? I know I won’t be able to manipulate the physical address as a physical address.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T03:14:14+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:14 am

    Nope. There’s no guarantee that a virtual address is based off a physical address (it may be a mapped file with no representation in RAM, for instance.) As well, the OS is free to move virtual addresses around in physical memory at any time, so there’s no guarantee that a physical address will remain correct or valid.

    Why do you think you need a physical address? What are you trying to accomplish?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Under Linux I can issue a gcc -Wl,--defsym,main=main_x .. However in Mac OSX 10
I am compiling under Linux (GCC 4.4.2) and Windows VS C++ Express Edition 2008
We're working on a C program compiled with arm-eabi-gcc under Linux. We're using a
i am new in programming under linux and trying to get working this code:
On my Linux platform, I have several versions of gcc . Under usr/bin I
I've noticed a difference in behaviour for gcc 's destructor when compiled under linux
I am just starting programming ansi c with gcc under ubuntu (9.04). I get
i used to get a list of processs under linux by enumerating the /proc
I've recently compiled a simple hello world C program under Debian Linux using gcc:
When using gcc under Linux, one does not need to add command-line options to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.