Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1036703
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:44:52+00:00 2026-05-16T14:44:52+00:00

Unless I’m crazy if None not in x and if not None in x

  • 0

Unless I’m crazy if None not in x and if not None in x are equivalent. Is there a preferred version? I guess None not in is more english-y and therefore more pythonic, but not None in is more like other language syntax. Is there a preferred version?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:44:52+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:44 pm

    They compile to the same bytecode, so yes they are equivalent.

    >>> import dis
    >>> dis.dis(lambda: None not in x)
      1           0 LOAD_CONST               0 (None)
                  3 LOAD_GLOBAL              1 (x)
                  6 COMPARE_OP               7 (not in)
                  9 RETURN_VALUE
    >>> dis.dis(lambda: not None in x)
      1           0 LOAD_CONST               0 (None)
                  3 LOAD_GLOBAL              1 (x)
                  6 COMPARE_OP               7 (not in)
                  9 RETURN_VALUE
    

    The documentation also makes it clear that the two are equivalent:

    x not in s returns the negation of x in s.

    As you mention None not in x is more natural English so I prefer to use this.

    If you write not y in x it might be unclear whether you meant not (y in x) or (not y) in x. There is no ambiguity if you use not in.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.