Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8899837
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T00:57:19+00:00 2026-06-15T00:57:19+00:00

Update 16th November 2012 I would like to raise this question again, offering with

  • 0

Update 16th November 2012

I would like to raise this question again, offering with a new bounty for a solid, good solution. It seems that only the solution (shubhansh‘s answer) does not effectively work now. I will explain why.

Firstly, this is the live map I have with radiuses and people, the radiuses are in red and the people are in blue.

enter image description here

As you can see, there are two people in this map with eight radiuses, basically I am getting only the person which is Person A, but I am not getting Person B, I’m guessing that the SQL is not correctly picking it up which I need it to be precise and accurate from the person’s radius and the marker radiuses.

It looks like what is picked up are are inside the radiuses, not those who overlap a radius, I need it to be able to pick up any results for any radiuses that overlap each other.

I am looking for a precise and accurate SQL than shubhansh’s answer. You may read below to read how exactly I need the query to act and pick up accurate people.

The data, PEOPLE:

+-----------+-----------+--------+
| latitude  | longitude | radius |
+-----------+-----------+--------+
| 51.517395 | -0.053129 | 5.6    |
| 51.506607 | -0.116129 | 0.7    |
+-----------+-----------+--------+

Please note that radius is in kilometers.

+-----------+-----------+-----+
| latitude  | longitude | km  |
+-----------+-----------+-----+
| 51.502117 | -0.103340 | 0.3 |
| 51.498913 | -0.120850 | 0.7 |
| 51.496078 | -0.108919 | 0.7 |
| 51.496506 | -0.095873 | 0.7 |
| 51.503399 | -0.090723 | 0.7 |
| 51.508049 | -0.100336 | 0.7 |
| 51.508797 | -0.112610 | 0.7 |
| 51.505535 | -0.125227 | 0.7 |
| 51.502331 | -0.108061 | 0.7 |
+-----------+-----------+-----+

The current SQL I use:

SELECT ppl.latitude,
       ppl.longitude,
       ppl.radius
FROM 
(
    people ppl
),
(
    SELECT latitude, longitude 
    FROM radiuses
) AS radius
WHERE (POW((ppl.longitude - radius.longitude) * 111.12 * COS(ppl.latitude), 2) + POW((ppl.longitude - radius.longitude) * 111.12, 2)) <= 4
GROUP BY ppl.id

The data for MySQL which you can use to test your query,

INSERT INTO radiuses (id, latitude, longitude, km) VALUES ('1', '51.502117', '-0.103340', '0.3'), ('2', '51.498913', '-0.120850', '0.7'), ('3', '51.496078', '-0.108919', '0.7'), ('4', '51.496506', '-0.095873', '0.7'), ('5', '51.503399', '-0.090723', '0.7'), ('6', '51.508049', '-0.100336', '0.7'), ('7', '51.508797', '-0.112610', '0.7'), ('8', '51.505535', '-0.125227', '0.7'), ('9', '51.502331', '-0.108061', '0.7');

INSERT INTO people (id, latitude, longitude, radius) VALUES ('1', '51.517395', '-0.053129', '5.6'), ('2', '51.506607', '-0.116129', '0.7');

Old summary

Note: all the latitudes and longitudes are just randomly made.

I have a map applet which a user can place his radius of a lat/lng location, with a 1km radius.

Now, there is another user that can put his radiuses, at any location on the map, each with 1km radius (same as the user above).

Like this User A is red and User B is blue.

enter image description here

Basically User A stores his radiuses in a table that looks like this:

+-----------+---------+-----------+-----------+
| radius_id | user_id | latitude  | longitude |
+-----------+---------+-----------+-----------+
|         1 |       1 | 81.802117 | -1.110035 |
|         2 |       1 | 81.798272 | -1.144196 |
|         3 |       1 | 81.726782 | -1.135919 |
+-----------+---------+-----------+-----------+

And User B stores his radius in another table that looks like this – (note: they can only store 1 coordinates per account):

+---------+-----------+-----------+
| user_id | latitude  | longitude |
+---------+-----------+-----------+
|       6 | 81.444126 | -1.244910 |
+---------+-----------+-----------+

I want to be able to pick up those users that fall within the defined radiuses, even if the radius circles are touching, in the map picture. Only marker C would be able to pick up the single radius, when A and B do not.

I’m sure this is possible, but I do not know how to come up with this kind of system in MySQL.

I found this on the Google Developers site it’s close but not just what it performs I need.

  • Creating a Store Locator with PHP, MySQL & Google Maps

EDIT: I have found a better one, this is very close, but still not what I am looking for, since it uses 1 bound of latitude and longitude coordinates when I have multiple in a table.

  • Select points from a database by latitude/longitude within a bounding circle
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T00:57:21+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 12:57 am

    The essential point of your geometry is that two circles overlap if the distance between their centers is less than the sum of their radii. Since we’re doing a comparison, we can use the square of the distance, since that avoids a square root operation. In the original, each radius is fixed at 1, the sum of the two radii is 2, and the square of the sum is 4.

    There’s a big difference between the original question and the new question. In the first you’ve got circles of fixed radius and the second you’ve got circles of varying radius. The constant 4 in the comparison expression [...distance^2...] <= 4 needs to be replaced, since that’s an artifact of the fixed radius of the original. To implement this, add the km field into the query. And as you should check, you weren’t using ppl.radius in the WHERE filter, so it’s hardly surprising that varying that value didn’t change your query results.

    SELECT ppl.latitude, ppl.longitude, ppl.radius
    FROM 
      ( people ppl ),
      ( SELECT latitude, longitude, km FROM radiuses ) AS B
    WHERE [...distance^2...] <= POW( ppl.radius + B.km, 2)
    

    I should say that this question took far longer to understand than it should have, because you’re calling the entity-that’s-not-a-person a “radius”, when really you’ve got a property that ought to be called ‘radius’ on two different entities. So name that other entity something descriptive.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Update 2018 : This question was asked long before PostCSS existed, and I would
UPDATE: I've been playing around with this more, and it seems like tmux's clear-history
UPDATE: I made a mistake in my debugging - this question is not relavent
UPDATE : A commenter told me to change some codes, this is the new
UPDATE The second after I posted this question, thanks to the syntax highlighting of
UPDATE This is an old question for an old version of Xcode. It turned
UPDATE: I found a Scipy Recipe based in this question! So, for anyone interested,
Update: Check out this follow-up question: Gem Update on Windows - is it broken?
Update: Please read this question in the context of design principles, elegance, expression of
Update: I asked the question because the result does not look like how it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.