Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5952803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T17:44:01+00:00 2026-05-22T17:44:01+00:00

Update Ignore the following. It turned out to be a bug restricted to Macruby

  • 0

Update

Ignore the following. It turned out to be a bug restricted to Macruby 0.10 and probably specific to my install. I’ll leave the post in case anyone else hits the problem.


I seemed to misunderstood something about ruby blocks. I wanted to use the Pathname or Find module’s find to locate a specific file within a specific directory tree. However, I cannot get the block provided to find to return any value.

Since this:

n= (1..10).each {|i| break i if i > 5} 
puts "n = #{n}" #=> n=6

… works (and is a common construction) I expected that either:

starting_directory= #... a directory path
file_name_I_want_to_find= #... a file name e.g. my_file.txt
pd=Pathname.new(starting_directory)
path=pd.find{|p| break p if p.basename.to_s==file_name_I_want_to_find } 
puts "path = #{path}" #=> path = 

… or:

path=Find.find(starting_directory) {|p| break p if p.include?(file_name_I_want_to_find) } 
puts "path = #{path}" #=> path = 

… would produce just the one sought path but neither produces a value at all.

I know my test works because both of the following:

pd.find{|p| puts p if p.basename.to_s==file_name_I_want_to_find } 
#=> /path/to/file_name_I_want_to_find

Find.find(starting_directory) {|p| puts p if p.include?(file_name_I_want_to_find) } 
#=> /path/to/file_name_I_want_to_find

… work as expected.

Why doesn’t break with find work the way it does in the first example?

More generally, am I using the correct ruby technique/idiom for this circumstance?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T17:44:01+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 5:44 pm

    It seems that using break works on ruby-1.8.7-p334 (MRI) on OSX, as well as JRuby-1.6.1.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Update: Check out this follow-up question: Gem Update on Windows - is it broken?
I have the following table structure as follows: (please ignore the blackbox. was formatting
I'm running the following code to update the database according to the data I
[UPDATE] What I ask below just isn't possible. In which case, as my brain
I am trying to get mercurial to ignore hidden files for a specific user.
Update: Solved, with code I got it working, see my answer below for the
Update: giving a much more thorough example. The first two solutions offered were right
UPDATE: Focus your answers on hardware solutions please. What hardware/tools/add-in are you using to
Update : Looks like the query does not throw any timeout. The connection is
Update: Now that it's 2016 I'd use PowerShell for this unless there's a really

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.