Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6155647
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T20:28:16+00:00 2026-05-23T20:28:16+00:00

Update I’ve managed to get around this. Now I check myself, whether the dependency

  • 0

Update

I’ve managed to get around this. Now I check myself, whether the dependency can be resolved. If not, I’ll look for a parameterless constructor (via Reflection) and call that. But I think this is Ninjects share of the work… so still more a workaround than a real solution.

Original Question

public class Test
{
    public Test(INavigationService asd)
    {
        // rnd stuff
    }

    public Test()
    {
        // other rnd stuff
    }
}

I’ve got this Test class. Now, I want two instances of it, created by Ninject. So I do the following:

Test test = Kernel.Get<Test>();

and run into an exception: “Ninject.ActivationException: Error activating INavigationService”.

If I reorder the constructors like this

public class Test
{
    public Test()
    {
        // other rnd stuff
    }

    public Test(INavigationService asd)
    {
        // rnd stuff
    }
}

it works.
But I can’t be sure, that every class I use with Ninject has its constructors in “correct” order.
So, is there a way to tell Ninject to not ignore the parameterless constructor, if it’s not the first one?

Thank you in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T20:28:17+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 8:28 pm

    Ninject tries to inject the one with the most parameters (that it knows how to resolve*). However, you can tell Ninject explicitly which constructor to inject:

    public class Test
    {
    
        public Test(INavigationService asd)
        {
            // rnd stuff
        }
    
        [Inject]
        public Test()
        {
            // other rnd stuff
        }
    }
    

    Note: You cannot put Inject attribute on more than one constructor. It’ll throw an exception.

    Update: Here’s another way to tackle this, worth trying.

    Bind<ITest>().ToMethod(x => factoryMethod());
    factoryMethod does two things:

    1. Checks if your dependency is loaded via Kernel.CanResolve() or some other way.
    2. If yes, then use the parameterized ctor. If not, use the parameterless constructor.

    Feels tacky and not sure if this is a good pattern to follow. If the parameters are optional, a better thing to do is use property injection (frowned upon generally) or method injection maybe.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Update: Check out this follow-up question: Gem Update on Windows - is it broken?
Update: Now that it's 2016 I'd use PowerShell for this unless there's a really
update - if I remove the runat=server this does not happen...then how do I
Update I asked this question quite a while ago now, and I was curious
UPDATE: It Is Now Working I was able to finally get it completed. A
UPDATE: I made a mistake in my debugging - this question is not relavent
Update : Looks like the query does not throw any timeout. The connection is
UPDATE - A comprehensive comparison, updated as of February 2015, can be found here:
Update: Please read this question in the context of design principles, elegance, expression of
UPDATE: In trying to replicate this problem one more time to answer your questions

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.