Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7772513
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T16:54:28+00:00 2026-06-01T16:54:28+00:00

Update: Mr. Nemo’s answer helped solve the problem! The code below contains the fix!

  • 0

Update: Mr. Nemo’s answer helped solve the problem! The code below contains the fix! See the nb False and nb True calls below.

There is also a new Haskell package called splice (, which has OS-specific and portable implementations of best known socket to socket data transfer loops).

I have the following (Haskell) code:

#ifdef LINUX_SPLICE
#include <fcntl.h>
{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ForeignFunctionInterface #-}
#endif

module Network.Socket.Splice (
    Length
  , zeroCopy
  , splice
#ifdef LINUX_SPLICE
  , c_splice
#endif
  ) where

import Data.Word
import Foreign.Ptr

import Network.Socket
import Control.Monad
import Control.Exception
import System.Posix.Types
import System.Posix.IO

#ifdef LINUX_SPLICE
import Data.Int
import Data.Bits
import Unsafe.Coerce
import Foreign.C.Types
import Foreign.C.Error
import System.Posix.Internals
#else
import System.IO
import Foreign.Marshal.Alloc
#endif


zeroCopy :: Bool
zeroCopy =
#ifdef LINUX_SPLICE
  True
#else
  False
#endif


type Length =
#ifdef LINUX_SPLICE
  (#type size_t)
#else
  Int
#endif


-- | The 'splice' function pipes data from
--   one socket to another in a loop.
--   On Linux this happens in kernel space with
--   zero copying between kernel and user spaces.
--   On other operating systems, a portable
--   implementation utilizes a user space buffer
--   allocated with 'mallocBytes'; 'hGetBufSome'
--   and 'hPut' are then used to avoid repeated 
--   tiny allocations as would happen with 'recv'
--   'sendAll' calls from the 'bytestring' package.
splice :: Length -> Socket -> Socket -> IO ()
splice l (MkSocket x _ _ _ _) (MkSocket y _ _ _ _) = do

  let e  = error "splice ended"

#ifdef LINUX_SPLICE

  (r,w) <- createPipe
  print ('+',r,w)
  let s  = Fd x -- source
  let t  = Fd y -- target
  let c  = throwErrnoIfMinus1 "Network.Socket.Splice.splice"
  let u  = unsafeCoerce :: (#type ssize_t) -> (#type size_t)
  let fs = sPLICE_F_MOVE .|. sPLICE_F_MORE
  let nb v = do setNonBlockingFD x v
                setNonBlockingFD y v
  nb False
  finally
    (forever $ do 
       b <- c $ c_splice s nullPtr w nullPtr    l  fs
       if b > 0
         then   c_splice r nullPtr t nullPtr (u b) fs)
         else   e
    (do closeFd r
        closeFd w
        nb True
        print ('-',r,w))

#else

  -- ..    

#endif


#ifdef LINUX_SPLICE
-- SPLICE

-- fcntl.h
-- ssize_t splice(
--   int          fd_in,
--   loff_t*      off_in,
--   int          fd_out,
--   loff_t*      off_out,
--   size_t       len,
--   unsigned int flags
-- );

foreign import ccall "splice"
  c_splice
  :: Fd
  -> Ptr (#type loff_t)
  -> Fd
  -> Ptr (#type loff_t)
  -> (#type size_t)
  -> Word
  -> IO (#type ssize_t)

sPLICE_F_MOVE :: Word
sPLICE_F_MOVE = (#const "SPLICE_F_MOVE")

sPLICE_F_MORE :: Word
sPLICE_F_MORE = (#const "SPLICE_F_MORE")
#endif

Note: The code above now just works! Below is no longer valid thanks to Nemo!

I call splice as defined above with two open and connected sockets (which are already used to transmit minimal amount of handshake data using either the sockets API send and recv calls or converted to handles and used with hGetLine and hPut) and I keep getting:

Network.Socket.Splice.splice: resource exhausted (Resource temporarily unavailable)

at the first c_splice call site: c_splice returns -1 and sets some errno to a value (probably EAGAIN) that reads resource exhausted | resource temporarily unavailable when looked up.

I tested calling splice with different Length values: 1024, 8192.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T16:54:29+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 4:54 pm

    I don’t know Haskell, but “resource temporarily unavailable” is EAGAIN.

    And it looks like Haskell sets its sockets to non-blocking mode by default. So if you try to read from one when there is no data, or try to write to one when its buffer is full, you will fail with EAGAIN.

    Figure out how to change the sockets to blocking mode, and I bet you will solve your problem.

    [update]

    Alternatively, call select or poll before attempting to read or write the socket. But you still need to handle EAGAIN, because there are rare corner cases where Linux select will indicate a socket is ready when actually it isn’t.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Update: Solved, with code I got it working, see my answer below for the
Update 2: thanks again to @deepak-azad, I managed to solve my problem : here
UPDATE maybe changing the Bitmap size in the new Activity may fix the problem
UPDATE - I'm probably being daft, see my last update below. I just did
Update : I found the solution by removing v.setFocusable(true); v.setClickable(true); in the code and
[Update]: my initial example doesn't reflect my problem. Updated the sample, hopfully it is
UPDATE!!! Suggested answer is NOT correct, my mistake. The #container DIV should've had float:left;.
Update: This is, as I was told, no principle Python related problem, but seems
UPDATE: Sorry I was wrong with my assumption of the problem. Its due to
[UPDATE] Was just an idiot mistake. See end for solution. I am trying to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.