Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 63865
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T18:42:00+00:00 2026-05-10T18:42:00+00:00

UPDATE: Thanks to everyone for the responses. I didn’t realize document.write() was deprecated. Add

  • 0

UPDATE: Thanks to everyone for the responses. I didn’t realize document.write() was deprecated. Add a another notch to the learning column. I’ll be taking the advice posted here, but leave the original question so that the answers given make sense in context of the original question.


I’m in the process of coding some rather long write() arguments and am trying to decide which of the following examples would be the best to follow, considering syntax, readability and performance. Should I

a. Keep them all on one line:

<script>      var someVariable = '(<a href=\'http://www.example.com\'>Link<\/a>)';      document.write('<p>Supergroovalisticprosifunkstication and Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious are very long words.</p>' + someVariable + '<p>Dociousaliexpisticfragilicalirepus is Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious spelled backwards.</p>' + someVariable);  </script> 

b. Break them up by adding line breaks for somewhat improved readability:

<script>      var someVariable = '(<a href=\'http://www.example.com\'>Link<\/a>)';      document.write('<p>Supergroovalisticprosifunkstication and Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious are very long words.</p>'          + someVariable         + '<p>Dociousaliexpisticfragilicalirepus is Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious spelled backwards.</p>'          + someVariable);  </script> 

c. Break them up by using multiple variables:

<script>      var someVariable = '(<a href=\'http://www.example.com\'>Link<\/a>)';      var partOne = '<p>Supergroovalisticprosifunkstication and Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious are very long words.</p>';      var partTwo = '<p>Dociousaliexpisticfragilicalirepus is Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious spelled backwards.</p>';       document.write(partOne + someVariable + partTwo + someVariable);  </script> 

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T18:42:01+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 6:42 pm

    My gut reaction is: don’t do that. (Your example is poor, you should not be writing big chunks of content in your behavior layer.)

    Whenever you have to do this, either concat:

    var longVar = 'asdfasdf asdf asdf asdfasdf asdfasdf asdf asdfasdf' +     ' fasdf s9d0af asdf asdf0s,dv z-xcfva-sdfmwaert ' +     'qersdfasdfasdfasdfasdf'; document.write(longVar); 

    Or if it gets really long, performance may benefit by using joining an array:

    var longVar = [     'asdfasdf asdf asdf asdfasdf asdfasdf asdf asdfasdf',     ' fasdf s9d0af asdf asdf0s,dv z-xcfva-sdfmwaert ',     'qersdfasdfasdfasdfasdf' ].join(''); document.write(longVar); 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Update: Thanks for the suggestions guys. After further research, I’ve reformulated the question here:
UPDATE: Focus your answers on hardware solutions please. What hardware/tools/add-in are you using to
Update: Solved, with code I got it working, see my answer below for the
Update: Check out this follow-up question: Gem Update on Windows - is it broken?
Update: giving a much more thorough example. The first two solutions offered were right
Update : Looks like the query does not throw any timeout. The connection is
Update: Now that it's 2016 I'd use PowerShell for this unless there's a really
UPDATE - A comprehensive comparison, updated as of February 2015, can be found here:
Update: Please read this question in the context of design principles, elegance, expression of
Please note that Object.Watch and Object.Observe are both deprecated now (as of Jun 2018).

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.