Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 173931
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T13:25:50+00:00 2026-05-11T13:25:50+00:00

UPDATED I’ve updated the example to better illustrate my problem. I realised it was

  • 0

UPDATED I’ve updated the example to better illustrate my problem. I realised it was missing one specific point – namely the fact that the CreateLabel() method always takes a label type so the factory can decide what type of label to create. Thing is, it might need to obtain more or less information depending on what type of label it wants to return.

I have a factory class that returns objects representing labels to be sent to a printer.

The factory class looks like this:

public class LargeLabel : ILabel {     public string TrackingReference { get; private set; }      public LargeLabel(string trackingReference)     {         TrackingReference = trackingReference;     } }  public class SmallLabel : ILabel {     public string TrackingReference { get; private set; }      public SmallLabel(string trackingReference)     {         TrackingReference = trackingReference;     } }  public class LabelFactory {     public ILabel CreateLabel(LabelType labelType, string trackingReference)     {         switch (labelType)         {             case LabelType.Small:                 return new SmallLabel(trackingReference);             case LabelType.Large:                 return new LargeLabel(trackingReference);         }     } } 

Say that I create a new label type, called CustomLabel. I want to return this from the factory, but it needs some additional data:

public class CustomLabel : ILabel {     public string TrackingReference { get; private set; }     public string CustomText { get; private set; }      public CustomLabel(string trackingReference, string customText)     {         TrackingReference = trackingReference;         CustomText = customText;     } } 

This means my factory method has to change:

public class LabelFactory {     public ILabel CreateLabel(LabelType labelType, string trackingReference, string customText)     {         switch (labelType)         {             case LabelType.Small:                 return new SmallLabel(trackingReference);             case LabelType.Large:                 return new LargeLabel(trackingReference);             case LabelType.Custom:                 return new CustomLabel(trackingReference, customText);         }     } } 

I don’t like this because the factory now needs to cater for the lowest common denominator, but at the same time the CustomLabel class needs to get a custom text value. I could provide the additional factory method as an override, but I want to enforce the fact that the CustomLabel needs the value, otherwise it’ll only ever be given empty strings.

What is the correct way to implement this scenario?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T13:25:51+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:25 pm

    Well, how do you want to call the factory method?

    Concentrate on how you want to be able to use your API, and the implementation will usually make itself fairly clear. This is made even easier if you write the desired results of your API as unit tests.

    An overload may well be the right thing to do here, but it really depends on how you want to use the factory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 92k
  • Answers 92k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Boost - the weak_ptr has some nice features that make… May 11, 2026 at 6:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer First I want to thank all for their answers. It… May 11, 2026 at 6:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Did you select the feature in the "Features" screen? On… May 11, 2026 at 6:31 pm

Related Questions

I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
(Updated: I've moved this over to ServerFault ) I'm responsible for maintaining a list
UPDATED I've updated the example to better illustrate my problem. I realised it was
I have a SQL Server 2000 database instance that is rarely updated. I also
I want to reload a page using: window.location.reload(true); But I receive the POSTDATA warning

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.