Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7989559
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T12:47:10+00:00 2026-06-04T12:47:10+00:00

Using Cloudformation can you set the Authenticated Users group to have put/delete Access Control

  • 0

Using Cloudformation can you set the Authenticated Users group to have put/delete Access Control when creating an S3 Bucket?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T12:47:11+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 12:47 pm

    This is not possible with the initial and respectively limited Access Control Lists (ACL) of Amazon S3, where only the predefined Canned ACLs are available for use with the AWS resource types supported by AWS CloudFormation in turn, see property AccessControl of the AWS::S3::Bucket resource:

    A canned ACL that grants predefined permissions on the bucket. Default
    is Private. For more information about canned ACLs, see Canned ACLs in the Amazon S3 documentation.

    Valid values for AccessControl: AuthenticatedRead | AwsExecRead | BucketOwnerRead | BucketOwnerFullControl | LogDeliveryWrite | Private | PublicRead | PublicReadWrite

    Assuming you do not want to give put/delete access to all S3 users in fact (which the Authenticated Users group actually implies to the surprise of the unaware S3 developer), but only to the users of your own (or a well known set of) account(s) as usual for most use cases, you can achieve your goal by using S3 Bucket Policies instead.

    The Example Cases for Amazon S3 Bucket Policies provide an example policy for Granting Permissions to Multiple Accounts with Added Restrictions, which grants PutObject, and PutObjectAcl permissions to multiple accounts and requires that the public-read canned acl is included – stripping this to the requested set and transforming it into a CloudFormation template snippet would yield the following approximately (you’d need to adjust the Principal to your account(s) of course):

    "Resources" : {
      "S3Bucket" : {
        "Type" : "AWS::S3::Bucket"
      },
      "BucketPolicy" : {
        "Type" : "AWS::S3::BucketPolicy",
        "Properties" : {
          "PolicyDocument": {
            "Id"           : "Grant access to all account users",
            "Statement"    : [{
              "Sid"        : "PutObjectAccess",
              "Action"     : ["s3:PutObject"],
              "Effect"     : "Allow",
              "Resource"   : { "Fn::Join" : ["", ["arn:aws:s3:::", {"Ref" : "S3Bucket"} ]]},
              "Principal"  : { "AWS": ["arn:aws:iam::111122223333:root","arn:aws:iam::444455556666:root"] }
            }]
          },
          "Bucket" : {"Ref" : "S3Bucket"}
        }
      },
    },
    

    Please be aware of the peculiarities of Using ACLs and Bucket Policies Together in case.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Using online interfaces to a version control system is a nice way to have
Using TortoiseSVN against VisualSVN I delete a source file that I should not have
I am using AWS CloudFormation for my application and am trying to make a
using (var file_stream = File.Create(users.xml)) { var serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(PasswordManager)); serializer.Serialize(file_stream, this); file_stream.Close();
Using PHP, I can convert MySQL data or static table data to csv, Excel,
Using C# for ASP.NET and MOSS development, we often have to embed JavaScript into
Using android 2.3.3, I have a background Service which has a socket connection. There's
Using jQuery, one can easily find out whether a particular element is visible using
Using the HTML5 File API I can get the Binary String representation of a
Using Git Bash or MinGW Shell , if I put in a command with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.