Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6319841
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T15:52:21+00:00 2026-05-24T15:52:21+00:00

Using Collections.unmodifiableMap(…) , I’m trying to return an unmodifiable view of a map. Let’s

  • 0

Using Collections.unmodifiableMap(...), I’m trying to return an unmodifiable view of a map. Let’s say I have the following method,

public final Map<Foo, Bar> getMap(){
    ...
    return Collections.unmodifiableMap(map);
}

Why is it legal elsewhere to do the following,

Map<Foo, Bar> map = getMap();
map.put(...);

This doesn’t throw an UnsupportedOperationException like I thought it would. Can someone please explain this, or suggest how I can successfully return a truly unmodifiable map?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T15:52:21+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 3:52 pm

    Are you sure you’re not masking your exceptions somehow? This works absolutely fine, in that it throws UnsupportedOperationException:

    import java.util.*;
    
    public class Test {
    
        public static void main(String[] args) {
            Map<String, String> map = getMap();
            map.put("a", "b");
        }
    
        public static final Map<String, String> getMap(){
            Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<String, String>();
            map.put("x", "y");
            return Collections.unmodifiableMap(map);
        }
    }
    

    I suggest you print out map.getClass() on the return value of the method – I would expect it to be an UnmodifiableMap.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this code (C#): using System.Collections.Generic; namespace ConsoleApplication1 { public struct Thing {
Consider the following snippet: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Net; namespace ForumLogins
Hii I have method in C#, I have to return multiple values from that
We all know when using Collections.synchronizedXXX (e.g. synchronizedSet() ) we get a synchronized view
Can the following piece of code be rewritten w/o using Collections.synchronizedMap() yet maintaining correctness
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.IO; I have to put
I am trying to write code to shuffle an Array without using Collections. My
I have an arraylist<string> of words. I sort it using Collections.sort(wordsList); I'm using this
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace GenericCount { class Program {
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Linq.Expressions; using System.Text; namespace ConsoleApplication1 { public

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.