Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 643693
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T21:18:38+00:00 2026-05-13T21:18:38+00:00

Using interfaces is a very easy way to remove dependencies, but what happens when

  • 0

Using interfaces is a very easy way to remove dependencies, but what happens when one of your classes needs a method not defined by the interface? If you’re using constructor injection or a factory, how do you access that extra method without casting? Is this possible?

Here is an example of a factory with this problem. Am I trying to do something impossible? Thanks for your help.

interface IFoo {
    int X { get; set; }
    int Y { get; set; }
}

public class A : IFoo {
    int X { get; set; }
    int Y { get; set; }
}

public class B : IFoo {
    int X { get; set; }
    int Y { get; set; }
    int Z { get; set; }
}

public static class FooFactory {
    public static IFoo GetFoo(string AorB) {
        IFoo result = null;
        switch (AorB) {
            case "A":
                result = new A();
                break;
            case "B":
                result = new B();
                break;
        }
        return result;
    }
}

public class FooContainer {
    private IFoo foo;

    public FooContainer(IFoo foo) {
        this.foo = foo;
    }

    /* What methods would you define here. I'm new to IoC. */
}

public class Main(...) {
    int x,y,z;
    IFoo fooA = FooFactory.GetFoo("A");
    x = foo.X;
    y = foo.Y;

    IFoo fooB = FooFactory.GetFoo("B");
    x = foo.X;
    y = foo.Y;
    z = foo.Z; /* Does not compile */
    z = ((B)foo).Z; /* Compiles, but adds unwanted dependency */
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T21:18:38+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:18 pm

    When you encounter the need to downcast an object, it is usually a sign that the API could be better.

    Downcasting an abstract type is a violation of the Liskov Substitution Principle. It can usually best be addressed by changing the style of the interface in question. Instead of exposing a lot of properties and queries (in CQS terminology), reverse the focus towards a more command-oriented approach. This is the Hollywood Principle.

    Instead of having IFoo expose the X and Y properties, you may be able to redefine its behavior towards a set of commands:

    public interface IFoo
    {
        void DoStuff();
    
        void DoSomethingElse(string bar);
    
        void DoIt(DateTime now);
    }
    

    Concrete implementations can then encapsulate whatever data they would like (such as X, Y or Z properties) without the consumer needing to know about them.

    When the interface grows to become too big, it’s time to apply the Interface Segregation Principle or the Single Responsibility Principle.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.