Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7858327
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T21:23:17+00:00 2026-06-02T21:23:17+00:00

Using shorter i18n keys (e.g. t ‘.submit_button’ ) in Rails views makes them easier

  • 0

Using shorter i18n keys (e.g. t '.submit_button') in Rails views makes them easier to type, but is it actually good? When later you decide to refactor your views and partials you have to remember to update the respective localization entries. Wouldn’t it be more robust to name them by their business meaning and always specify the full key-name?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T21:23:18+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 9:23 pm

    Well, I’m using a mixture. 😉

    For things like “yes”, “no”, “submit”, “cancel” I tend to use a namespace called “defaults” so I always use it like t 'defaults.cancel'. That could also address the “submit_button” thing you mentioned above.
    For my specific views I decided to use the lazy lookup feature.

    If you want I18n keys for specific views you have to decide what fits best for you:

    • If you don’t mind searching your yaml file for the I18n keys and
      change them if you change the view do so. The advantage is that you
      save some characters for each I18n.t call of it in your view.

    • But if you change your view names very often (not sure why you should
      have to do so 🙂 ) then you might be better of using the way you described.

    As I already said I prefer the first option since it’s more convenient for me.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am finding that using assert(...) makes my code shorter and easier to read,
I am currently using this type of mod_rewrite code for all my page...but i
Is there a shorter way of writing this (without using regex or string-matching functions)?
We're using google translate to translate some shorter texts dynamically on our site. The
Is there a shorter version of the following: Using ASP.NET MVC, this is in
Is there shorter/nicer way to read input in console as enumerable using standard features
I'm using Thinking Sphinx in a Rails application combined with the jQuery autocomplete plugin
I'm trying to write shorter code using jquery. What is the best way to
I'm using SDL for a project of mine, and I want a shorter way
Is there a way to do this shorter, for instance using some sort of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.