Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8102491
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T23:15:18+00:00 2026-06-05T23:15:18+00:00

Usually, as my code base grows, the functions recieve more and more arguments and

  • 0

Usually, as my code base grows, the functions recieve more and more arguments and it becomes a little sloppy to maintain, so I usually just default to something like this:

f = function(args){return args.v + 1;}

f({"v":2});

It looks way more cleaner, but is it OK to do? Why isn’t everyone doing this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T23:15:19+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 11:15 pm

    “it looks way more cleaner, but is it OK to do?”

    Yes.

    “Why isn’t everyone doing this?”

    Aren’t they though? This is standard practice for the most common “many parameter” situation in Javascript: passing options. Since there’s no overhead to creating a one-off object in Javascript, it’s common practice when you have more than a couple parameters.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've recently discovered this technique in my ASP.NET code base that I maintain. What
When performing many inserts into a database I would usually have code like this:
I am currently deploying a Rails application using Capistrano. Cap deploy:update_code usually works just
I usually test my code locally on my work machine and then move it
To be able to unit test my C++ code I usually pass the constructor
I usually play with elisp code on my scratch buffer. I find it hard
I have been seeing code like this usually in the start of header files:
When writing code in an Eclipse project, I'm usually quite messy and undisciplined in
I want some code to be triggered every second. Usually, I'd create a Timer
Sometimes in case of a bug in our code, we usually ask the end

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.