Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4044398
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T13:14:58+00:00 2026-05-20T13:14:58+00:00

Version 8.0.1 of Mathematica has just been released and it didn’t fix the bug

  • 0

Version 8.0.1 of Mathematica has just been released and it didn’t fix the bug that has been most annoying me. This is a known bug and WRI promise to fix it “in a future release”.
Until they do, maybe we can find a workaround.

The symbol for \[Conjugate] (which is entered using the shortcut ⋮conj⋮) was broken in between Mathematica versions 7 and 8. In version 8 it does not display, which leads to a lot of confusion when reading my old code. Compare the two versions:

V7

V8


There are two options that I can think of:

  1. Find the symbol that the frontend displays when it sees \[Conjugate] and tell it to display something visible. I’m not sure if this is possible to do without working at WRI and recompiling the frontend.
  2. Redefine the shortcut ⋮conj⋮ (as described in this SO question) to create a different postfix operator that displays as a superscript * and is immediately interpreted as Conjugate[] — i.e. it has the same behaviour as \[Conjugate]. The display properties can probably be taken care of using an InterpretationBox etc…

The problem with option 2, is that it won’t fix my old notebooks.

Does anyone have any different ideas or an implementation of the above?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T13:14:59+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 1:14 pm

    You want UnicodeFontMapping.tr (affects appearance) rather than UnicodeCharacters.tr (affects interpretation). Make a backup copy of UnicodeFontMapping.tr and edit the line:

    0xF3C8 N 6 0xad # \[Conjugate]

    to something like (using whatever replacement glyph you want):

    0xF3C8 N 1 0x2a # *

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is most likely a bug in Mathematica 8.0.1 and maybe other versions too.
Version Control with Subversion recommends the following layout for (single-project) repositories (complemented by this
Version 1.0 of an application has a data model, which is saved/loaded using the
Tomcat (version 5 here) stores session information in memory. When clustering this information is
I have a question that may have been answered over 9000 times before but
Mathematica notebooks are, of course, plaintext files -- it seems reasonable to expect that
It seems that Mathematica's handling of principal value integrals fails on some corner cases.
Just out of curiosity. It doesn't seem very logical that typeof NaN is number.
I got a big prob with mathematica(using version 8). Plotting a Voronoi Diagram is
Version 2 of Twitters Bootstrap UI framework was released today. While I find it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.