Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6991839
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T19:33:24+00:00 2026-05-27T19:33:24+00:00

void operator<< (const Integer& left, const Integer& right) { cout << \n: << right.i;

  • 0
void operator<< (const Integer& left, const Integer& right)
{
    cout << "\n: " << right.i;
}

can be accessed like:

Integer obj;
obj << 5 << 3 << 2;

Fine:

But qDebug works like qdebug() << 2;

Which means that the left operand of << operator is a function.

What should be the syntax of a user defined function so that I can write:
myfunc() << 2;

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T19:33:24+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 7:33 pm

    The left operand is not a function, it is the value the function returns. Specifically, qDebug() returns an instance of QDebug, which has some 20 overloads of << defined.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have code like this: class Base { public: void operator = (const Base&
Here's what I've got: void set::operator =(const set& source) { if (&source == this)
So why is Copy constructor not being invoked in const Integer operator+(const Integer &rv)
why does void operator<<(ostream out, Test &t); return an error whereas void operator<<(ostream &out,
Looks like operator new and operator new[] have exactly the same signature: void* operator
class Widget { public: Widget() { cout<<~Widget()<<endl; } ~Widget() { cout<<~Widget()<<endl; } void* operator
Possible Duplicate: Deleting a pointer to const (T const*) void operator delete (void*); ...
class Action { public: void operator() () const; } class Data { public: Data();
void (int a[]) { a[5] = 3; // this is wrong? } Can I
void foo(void **Pointer); int main () { int *IntPtr; foo(&((void*)IntPtr)); } Why do I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.