Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6655813
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T01:34:00+00:00 2026-05-26T01:34:00+00:00

WCF does not support request streaming (aka streaming upload of large data) over HTTP

  • 0

WCF does not support request streaming (aka streaming upload of large data) over HTTP with HTTP authentication. My first guess was it is because of authentication handshake causing the streaming request to be send twice to the server. But that is also the case for large request in buffered mode so it doesn’t make sense.

You can easily implement request streaming with HTTP authentication in custom ASP.NET http handler. If you have control over the client you can even avoid “multiple requests problem” by doing explicit HTTP HEAD to pre-authenticate to server and then reuse persistent connection to do the actual streaming request with HTTP POST.

So can anybody think of the reason(s) WCF not supporting this? (other than no time to do that)

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T01:34:00+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 1:34 am

    The reason is that you must first send the whole request (even streamed) to get HTTP 401 and follow security handshake and finally send the whole request again. Because streaming is supposed to be used with very large messages this process can be very slow and add unwanted traffic over the network so MS probably did design decision to not allow it at all.

    The trick with HEAD request is not implemented in WCF.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We’ve recently discovered that WCF does not support timing out operations on the service
My WCF service does not recognize request parameter values that are sent in unqualified
Possible Duplicates: What is REST?[closed] Does the WCF REST WebChannelFactory client support REST services
Does silverlight 4 beta supports wshttpbinding (wcf)? If not, will it be supported in
Is there a reason that the Silverlight Ready WCF does not have an Interface
I have been told that wsHttpBinding does not support older clients that still need
UPDATE: The service cannot be activated because it does not support ASP.NET compatibility. ASP.NET
Given that the System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding class in WCF does not have a Clone method, what
We're getting a The current configuration system does not support user-scoped settings compilation exception
What benefits does WCF bring to the table and why should I use this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.