Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6838177
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:33:56+00:00 2026-05-26T23:33:56+00:00

We all know about short circuiting in logical expressions, i.e. when if ( False

  • 0

We all know about short circuiting in logical expressions, i.e. when

if ( False AND myFunc(a) ) then
...

doesn’t bother executing myFunc() because there’s no way the if condition can be true.

I was curious as to whether there is an equivalent for your everyday algebraic equation, say

result = C*x/y + z

If C=0 there is no point in evaluating the first term. It wouldn’t matter much performance-wise if x and y were scalars, but if we pretend they are large matrices and the operations are costly (and applicable to matrices) then surely it would make a difference. Of course you could avoid such an extreme case by throwing in an if C!=0 statement.

So my question is whether such a feature exists and if it is useful. I’m not much of a programmer so it probably does under some name that I haven’t come across; if so please enlighten me 🙂

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:33:57+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:33 pm

    The concept you are talking about goes under different names: lazy evaluation, non-strict evaluation, call by need, to name a few and is actually much more powerful than just avoiding a multiplication here and there.

    There are programming languages like Haskell or Frege whose evaluation model is non-strict. There it would be quite easy to write your “short circuiting” multiplication operator, for example you could write something like:

    infixl 7 `*?`        -- tell compiler that ?* is a left associative infix operator
                         -- with precedence 7 (like the normal *)
    
    0 *? x = 0           -- do not evaluate x
    y *? x = y * x       -- fall back to standard multiplication
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Are there any open-source libraries that all programmers should know about? I'm thinking something
First of all, I know there is a lot of questions about this topic.
We all know about Boost . What other free C++ libraries are worth using?
All I know about the constraint is it's name ( SYS_C003415 ), but I
The point of M-V-VM as we all know is about speraration of concerns. In
What are all the common undefined behaviours that a C++ programmer should know about?
First of all, I know about the command line parameter, but I don't want
I wish to know all the pros and cons about using these two methods.
I'm talking about the performance increase here. From all I know you can echo
I know I could just make all the Mix_Musics public, and not worry about

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.