Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 316359
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T08:22:37+00:00 2026-05-12T08:22:37+00:00

We all know that refactoring is good and I love it as much as

  • 0

We all know that refactoring is good and I love it as much as the next guy, but do you have real cases where is better not to refactor ?

Something like time critical stuff or synchronization? Technical or human reasons are equally welcome. Real cases scenarios and experiences a plus.

Edit : from the answers thus far, it looks like the only reason not to refactor is money. My question is mostly relative to something like this: suppose you would like to perform “extract method”, but if you add the additional function call, you will make the code slightly less faster and hinder a very strict synchronization. Just to give you an idea of what I mean.

Another reason I sometimes heard is that “others used to the current code layout will get annoyed by your changes”. Of course, I doubt this is a good reason.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T08:22:37+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 8:22 am

    To reinforce the other answer (and touch on issues you mention): do not refactor a part of the code until it’s well covered by all relevant kinds of testing. This doesn’t mean “don’t refactor it” — the emphasis is on “add the necessary tests” (to do unit-tests properly may well require some refactoring, particularly the introduction of factory DPs and/or dependency injection DPs in code that’s now solidly bolted to concrete dependencies).

    Note that this does cover your second paragraph’s issues: if a section of the code is time-critical it should be well covered by “load-tests” (which like the more usual kind, correctness-test, should cover both specific units [albeit performance-wise — correctness-checking is other tests’ business!-)] AND end-to-end operations — the equivalent of unit tests and integration tests if one was talking about correctness rather than performance).

    Multi-tasking code with subtle sync issues can be a nightmare as no test can really make you entirely confident about it — no other refactoring (that might in any way affect any fragile sync that just appears to be working now) should be considered BEFORE one intended to make the synchronization much, MUCH more robust and sound (message-passing through guaranteed-threadsafe queues being BY FAR my favorite design pattern in this regard;-).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 237k
  • Answers 237k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Well, I achieved the results I was expecting with a… May 13, 2026 at 6:38 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would left join table2 on id where id is… May 13, 2026 at 6:38 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer node_temp = malloc(sizeof(node_temp)); is allocating the size of a struct… May 13, 2026 at 6:38 am

Related Questions

I'm keen to drink some modern dynamic language koolaid, so I've believed all the
The company that owns the company that I work for has recently decided unilaterally
Apologies if this has been asked before. I searched and couldn't find it. In
There are many things that all programmers should know, but I am particularly interested

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.