Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 350653
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T11:34:12+00:00 2026-05-12T11:34:12+00:00

We are developing a file system for Windows using IFS Kit. We started to

  • 0

We are developing a file system for Windows using IFS Kit.
We started to investigate a performance problem which caused our file system I/O to be much slower when shared over the network. After looking at it with FileMon and TCPView from Sysinternals we found out that if a NTFS/FAT was shared, the SMB client and server were transferring I/O in 60K blocks, while while sharing our file system it used 4K blocks.

These two block sizes correspond to the SMB “core” and “raw” modes – this is explained here by Microsoft.

The problem is that we cannot figure out what in our file system causes the windows share server (srv.sys) to choose core mode (4K) for our file system and raw mode (60K) for NTFS and FAT.

Even hints at what to check are welcome.

KIV

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T11:34:12+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:34 am

    The issue was resolved by setting the FO_CACHE_SUPPORTED flag in the file system object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 210k
  • Answers 210k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would recommend Project Euler. It's a great way to… May 12, 2026 at 9:56 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Printing the rows with numbers: grep -n "\$str" filename Iterating… May 12, 2026 at 9:56 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This: //Passenger[contains(PaxNo,./PaxAssociated)] is: Find any <Passenger> with a child <PaxNo>… May 12, 2026 at 9:56 pm

Related Questions

I'm currently working on cross-platform applications and was just curious as to how other
A member of my team is developing a Rails app on Windows XP. We
We are developing a c# application that imports address-data into a CRM-system. The CSV-file
We are developing a considerably big application using Ruby on Rails framework (CRM system)

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.