Question

We are having a debate at my office around what can and cannot go in a JAR file. It has been suggested that it is poor form to have anything that is not a .class file go into a JAR. We currently have some XML configurations for Ibatis/etc, some property files.. the usual. However, there is a push to extract all such files from JARs and put them onto the local file system of each deployment machine. Does this sound reasonable?

Answer 1

It does not sound reasonable to me. I believe, that some application’s configuration should be in jar file. Such things as ORM mappings, spring config, custom spring namespace XSD, other XSDs, etc.. should be in most cases in jar. It’s important part of deployment artifact.

The fact, that it’s not class file, does not mean, that it should be taken out of jar just because it’s theoretically can be modified without building a new jar. Can you imagine a modification of *.hbm.xml in production? for me it sounds very scary.

I think some configuration, like spring xml, is meant in most cases to better organize your application and dependencies, but not to change them at runtime in production.