Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4010368
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T08:59:27+00:00 2026-05-20T08:59:27+00:00

We are required to use a specific library for serialization, that is used like

  • 0

We are required to use a specific library for serialization, that is used like this:

var obj = Serializer.Deserialize(myStream); //Read
Serializer.Serialize(obj, myOtherStream); //Write

We need to expose this via a web service, and I have gotten this working as such:

  • File -> New Project -> ASP .Net WebForms site
  • In Page.Load, we use the Request and Response members to do the serialization
  • Modify the ContentType in the Response
  • We then call Response.End()
  • We also had to put Async=”true” in the aspx page

And all of this seems to be working fine.

Is there a better way to handle this? We want our service to run in IIS, but we didn’t know if there was any overhead in making this an aspx page.

Is there any benefit to hooking this up with WCF?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T08:59:28+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 8:59 am

    Well, if you have a page that has no actual web form components, you can just use a handler page. That will cut down on some overhead.

    <%@ WebHandler Language="C#" Class="Handler" %>
    
    using System;
    using System.Web;
    
    public class Handler : IHttpHandler {
    
        public void ProcessRequest (HttpContext context) {
    
            context.Response.ContentType = "text/xml";
            Serializer.Serialize(obj, context.Response.Stream); //Write
    
        }
    
        public bool IsReusable {
            get {
                return false;
            }
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When starting a new project that required the use of membership providers I found
In ASP.NET MVC, we're required to use the suffix Controller for all controllers. This
Is .NET 3.5 SP1 Required on the server to use Dynamic Data? It looks
I have a console application that require to use some code that need administrator
Everything I read about better PHP coding practices keeps saying don't use require_once because
I have a project that I am working on that requires the use of
I have a project the requires the use of the exec family. My project
My company requires me to use Outlook for my E-mail. Outlook does virtually nothing
To use modular exponentiation as you would require when using the Fermat Primality Test
We use SAX to parse XML because it does not require the entire XML

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.