Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 871189
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T10:36:11+00:00 2026-05-15T10:36:11+00:00

We are using Moq as our mocking framework, the problem is that type that

  • 0

We are using Moq as our mocking framework, the problem is that type that needs to be mock-able is done using an interface, the problem with that is anything in that interface will be public and therefore considered part our public API.

is there a way to have to have a member that is mockable and not public?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T10:36:11+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:36 am

    If I’ve understood you correctly you want to be able to apply an interface to a type to support mocking, but do so in a manner that the interface will not be visible to public consumers of you code.

    Well, one option is that you could implement an internal interface and use the [assembly:InternalsVisibleToAttribute] to make the internal types accessible to your unit tests.

    [assembly:InternalsVisibleTo("MyUnitTestAssembly")]
    
    internal interface ISomeInterfaceForMocking { ... }
    
    public class MyMockableType : ISomeInterfaceForMocking { ... }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 515k
  • Answers 515k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I have found this but it only works in Internet… May 16, 2026 at 6:34 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Crystal Reports has special runtime packages for this usage. May 16, 2026 at 6:34 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer In a functional language as XSLT there is no "order… May 16, 2026 at 6:34 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

We are looking to make a final decision on our Mocking framework. After trying
We are using Moq to unit test our service classes, but are stuck on
We're using ELMAH for handling errors in our ASP.Net MVC c# application and in
I've been going through the process of cleaning up our controller code to make
I'm brand new to unit testing and mocking and still wet behind the ears.
We have a small wrapper class that uses ResourceManager to load string resources from
I am trying to write a unit test for our log out method. Among
Currently I'm reading a book (Pro ASP.Net Framework). In this book, the author suggests
I'm using this helper method to turn my PartialViewResult into string and returning it
Is it possible to mock the enterprise library 5 version of 'Database'? If so...

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.