Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 567011
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:02:16+00:00 2026-05-13T13:02:16+00:00

We currently are in a debate within our IT group over what the best

  • 0

We currently are in a debate within our IT group over what the best practice is for handling the majority of all of our processes. Our IT director is pushing for everything to be event driven. His reasoning is that is will save on resources and it is the “best method” for sending ship notifications, order validations, order processing, etc.

Another developer and I don’t disagree on saving resources but argue that we are no longer in control of the process. If something breaks we can easily re-flag/queue or scheduled processes to pick up the errored transactions or handle things like communication failures.

In a perfect enivronment uses event driven processes all over would be great because you wouldn’t ever have to check for anything. But for us we know we will encounter data issues, etc and need to be able to quickly correct the problem or shut off the process while we fix it. How do others handle when a bunch of events fail? It is not that easy to re-trigger/fire the events….so it appears, but I could be completely overlooking other solutions.

I am not going for a right/wrong more just trying to see what others think about the different processes and what issues/problems they have encountered.

Always appreciate the feedback.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:02:17+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:02 pm

    An event driven system can be very flexible like you mention. We have an event driven framework where I work, and one of the events is actually an exception event. Our health monitor is event driven, and if there is a problem, health problem, or data issue, we’re notified by email and everything is logged to a database, event log, or file. Events allow the processes to drive themselves without direct interaction from a user.

    As with any automatic process there needs to be auditing and control of some nature. There should be some interval by which a random set of results is checked for validity. We print approximately 80,000 legal documents nightly that are distributed/indexed/verified automatically based on an event produced by a software on another machine. However, we have a human QC authority responsible each morning for testing a sampling of them and then releasing them into the wild.

    Events really can save you a lot of administrative time and can be very easy to implement. I would highly recommend it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am currently in a debate with a coworker about the best practices concerning
currently we have quite a chunky auditing system for objects within our application, the
We're currently having a debate whether it's better to throw faults over a WCF
There Currently is a local debate as to which code is more readability We
I am currently involved in a debate with my coworkers surrounding how I should
Some co-workers and I got into a debate on the best way to store
I'm building a new project and I'm having some debate over how it needs
We've currently a debate here about original domain names versus generic domain names in
I remember seeing a debate about this somewhere, and am currently considering removing a
We currently have a heated internal debate as to whether the actual .NET assembly

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.