Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 139071
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:22:11+00:00 2026-05-11T07:22:11+00:00

We currently have a system where each client gets their own database when they

  • 0

We currently have a system where each client gets their own database when they sign-up. Not surprisingly this is getting out of hand.

We are preparing merge all these databases together to a single db. In order to do this we need to note which organization the row belongs. How best is this handled on the database and what pros/cons (Speed, Maintainability, etc) are there to the methods below?

Option 1: Make the Organization Id to all tables and make it part of the primary key (making all keys composite).

Option 2: Add Organization Id to all tables as a column with a Foreign Key to the Organization Table.

Option 3: Something else.

We are looking at moving to NHibernate with this move, if that has an effect on what is done.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:22:11+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:22 am

    Option 1 and 2 are not mutually exclusive and you should do both. A foreign key constraint on the organization helps ensure that your organization keys are valid. A composite primary key is the only way to achieve uniqueness, unless you want to re-key all your records, and it is also valuable for lookup performance. Alternatively, you’d have to create a new primary key column on the combined data, an identity column, for instance. Such a change would likely require more changes in other places.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The university I work at uses Oracle for the database system. We currently have
Currently using System.Web.UI.WebControls.FileUpload wrapped in our own control. We have licenses for Telerik. I
I currently have an archaic system of client records that I am trying to
Currently I have this problem. Client downloads from server successfully only the 1st time.
We currently have an inventory management system that was built in-house. It works great,
I currently have a fairly robust server-side validation system in place, but I'm looking
Currently I have: <system.net> <mailSettings> <smtp from=me@mydomain.com> <network host=localhost port=25 /> </smtp> </mailSettings> </system.net>
I have a J2EE-based system which is running currently on Apache Tomcat. We are
I currently have an MS Access application that connects to a PostgreSQL database via
I'm currently developing a system to transmit data between client and server, and was

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.