Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1028495
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T12:23:48+00:00 2026-05-16T12:23:48+00:00

We currently use SNAPSHOT modifier in development so that project dependencies are linked to

  • 0

We currently use SNAPSHOT modifier in development so that project dependencies are linked to the most current build of its dependencies. So when we build a project we get all the jars with various time SNAPSHOTS. Regardless of a code change.

This proves to be an issue when the end user wants to download a new release. For example there is a big jar file that is rarely updated. We would like for that particular jar file to be referred to as it version number 1.4 as supposed to 1.4-SNAPSHOT when we release it to the customer meaning they only download new version when we make changes to the version number as supposed to when we last built it with or without changes.

What is the best way to achieve this? Am I missing something?

Please and thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T12:23:49+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:23 pm

    This proves to be an issue when the end user wants to download a new release.

    First of all, releases should indeed use fixed versions. So if you’re developing version 1.4-SNAPSHOT, the release version is supposed to be 1.4 (and you tag it as such in your VCS). And then you bump the new development version to 1.5-SNAPSHOT in the dev branch.

    For example there is a big jar file that is rarely updated. We would like for that particular jar file to be referred to as it version number 1.4 (…)

    But even if you follow the above “standard” process, nothing forces you to bump all versions after a release and you could just stick to a given fixed version of a particular artifact. This would remove the problem.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I currently use Notepad++ for most of my development. I have been checking out
I currently use a DataTable to get results from a database which I can
The question says it all. The specialty in my case is that the current
I currently use nant, ccnet (cruise control), svn, mbunit. I use msbuild to do
I currently use subversion for my version control via AhnkSVN and Visual Studio. I
I currently use AnkhSVN to integrate subversion into Visual Studio. Is there any reason
I currently use my local web server to allow costumers to preview some applications
We currently use a hand-rolled setup and configuration script and a hand-rolled continuous integration
I currently use the following command, but it's a little unwieldy to type. What's
We currently use VSS 6, this is not going to change I am afraid.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.