Home/ Questions/Q 6250963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-24T13:31:31+00:00

We had a discussion with the colleagues about project references and version control systems.

  • 0

We had a discussion with the colleagues about project references and version control systems. We’re divided in 2 groups:

  • Add all referenced assemblies (except for the default .NET Framework) to a references folder in your solution, reference from there and check this folder in into your version control system. Pros: everybody can check out the code and build the project, no matter on which environment he’s working.

  • Reference to the GAC for all major products (e.g. SharePoint) and only add more exotic libraries in the references folder, after all people working on the project have their system set up for the job (like have SharePoint installed for SharePoint development, since VS2010 doesn’t open these solutions without). Pros: you’re sure that you’re working against the real installed assemblies and not some beta/SP/.. version that one of the developers has installed and copied over to the references folder.

What’s the best practice? Or are there even better solutions?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    if you reference against the GAC version of assemblies then you need to maintain a list of installed addons so a new developer can start work straight away. If you don’t maintain this list then when a developer does an initial check out from source control the solution will not build.

    Also if referencing from the GAC a CI system may not have a successful build due to the same reasons. I know its not a great solution to store binary assemblies in source control but at least it means all developers will be using the same versions of files

    • 0