Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 330885
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T09:43:23+00:00 2026-05-12T09:43:23+00:00

We had an incident recently where some code got released to live that was

  • 0

We had an incident recently where some code got released to live that was not scheduled to be released.

It had obviously been checked into the trunk. Which is fine i guess as you want to ‘check in early, check in often’.

However in this instance it was not supposed to be released in the next release.

What kind of checks / strategy / process can be put in place to avoid code being released to live prematurely.

It seems to me even with Continuous Integration and Unit Tests this is a human procedure issue?

— Lee

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T09:43:23+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 9:43 am

    Amend your integration procedures.

    If “going live” means someone executing some batch script – don’t be surprised if this will happen again.

    Also, consider branching. A common example might be to use the trunk for development, a separate branch for testing (say, gets merged once a week), and a final branch (from the aforementioned testing branch) for RTC.

    This branch, before being deployed to production, should be tested thoroughly.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 183k
  • Answers 183k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer create unique index myIdx on tableC(tableA_ID, tableB_ID) or whatever the… May 12, 2026 at 4:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You are using a UI to an asp app. That… May 12, 2026 at 4:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Many ISPs block port 25 to prevent spam. You might… May 12, 2026 at 4:43 pm

Related Questions

I hope everyone will pardon the length, and narrative fashion, of this question. I
My dev environment is LAMP-based (Drupal); there are several JS (jQuery) files that are
Anyone out there have any experience with passing off a finished product to the
I saw this quote in this question : MS support is poor, except when

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.