Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7543583
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T08:27:57+00:00 2026-05-30T08:27:57+00:00

We have a 3 machine cache cluster running with SQL configuration provider. The service

  • 0

We have a 3 machine cache cluster running with SQL configuration provider. The service is running under a domain account on the cache hosts (We are not using Security). The SQL server is also running under the a domain user account. We had issues with caching service running under Network Service and could not connect to SQL at all. But this configuration allowed the cluster to be up and running smoothly.

There are 2 types of cache clients. One of the cache clients is a native c++ exe running under the same domain account that the cache service runs on. These cache clients are on different machines. All such clients can successfully connect to the cache host.

The second type of a cache client is a .NET web application that runs under Network Service. This client is unable to write/fetch anything into the cache host. It is able successfully initialize the cache factory but fails with :

`Creating Region for general use in default cache

Error in Cache Call : ErrorCode<ERRCA0017>:SubStatus<ES0001>:There is a temporary     failure. Please retry later. : http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=164049
at Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.DataCache.ThrowException(ResponseBody respBody)
at Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.DataCache.CreateRegion(String region)
at CacheAPISample.Program.CreateRegion(String myRegion)
at CacheAPISample.Program.RunSampleTest()
at CacheAPISample.Program.Main(String[] args)`

From the error description there is no indication of what kind of error would this be. I have made sure the domain\clientmachinename$ is a allowed cache client. Security and Protection are turned off. Firewall rules are enabled (Given client type 1 can successfully call, firewall is ruled out as an issue).

So far I have tried:

  1. Running sample tests with a domain user from client type 2. And also making sure the domain user is a allowed cache client.

  2. Host mapping the cache server.

What should I do to get down to the actual root cause of the error? The logs at the cache hosts are clean. There are no errors.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T08:27:59+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 8:27 am

    Just as a followup, I believe this was partly resolved by ensuring that the client system could resolve the AppFabric server by machine name (using etc/hosts hack) not by FQDN. This appears to be a known issue out there. Unfortunately the error message is the same for this and other real failures.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have a Windows machine running SQL Server 2005, and we need to be
I have a machine that is running Ubuntu Hardy, which provides its own RubyGems
I am running a windows machine have installed Python 2.5. I also used the
I currently have a distributed cache using EHCache via RMI that works just fine.
Hosting an AppFabric cache on the same machine as an sql server presents some
I have to call the web service using java script? e.g. I'm creating one
I have a machine with VmWare installed which added two extra network interfaces. The
I have a machine which uses an NTP client to sync up to internet
I currently have a machine with an Opteron 275 (2.2Ghz), which is a dual
Currently, I have a machine on which I am working in Eclipse, it says

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.