Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 961673
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T01:23:00+00:00 2026-05-16T01:23:00+00:00

We have a component based C++ design, where each component is comprised of a

  • 0

We have a component based C++ design, where each component is comprised of a public outer class that is used to group component interfaces. Each interface is defined as a nested class as shown below.

struct ComponentContainer {

    class InterfaceClass_1 : public ComponentInterface {
        public:
        virtual ~InterfaceClass_1 ()              = 0;
        virtual InterfaceClass_1* GetInterface()  = 0;
        virtual void InterfaceMethod1 ()          = 0;
        virtual void InterfaceMethod2 ()          = 0;
    };

    class InterfaceClass_2 : public ComponentInterface {
        public:
        virtual ~InterfaceClass_2 ()             = 0;
        virtual InterfaceClass_2* GetInterface() = 0;
        virtual void InterfaceMethod1 ()         = 0;
        virtual void InterfaceMethod2 ()         = 0;
    };
};

My first question is whether or not it is correct / advised to use a class as the container for a component? Is it more correct to replace “struct ComponentContainer” with “namespace ComponentContainer”?

Since Interface classes are always public, I have been thinking of changing the structure to look like this:

namespace ComponentContainer {

    struct InterfaceClass_1 : ComponentInterface {
        virtual ~InterfaceClass_1 ()              = 0;
        virtual InterfaceClass_1* GetInterface()  = 0;
        virtual void InterfaceMethod1 ()          = 0;
        virtual void InterfaceMethod2 ()          = 0;
    };

    struct InterfaceClass_2 : ComponentInterface {
        virtual ~InterfaceClass_2 ()             = 0;
        virtual InterfaceClass_2* GetInterface() = 0;
        virtual void InterfaceMethod1 ()         = 0;
        virtual void InterfaceMethod2 ()         = 0;
    };
};

Is this method of defining a component preferable to my first example? Are there any fundamental flaws that I need to look out for?

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T01:23:01+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 1:23 am

    The main differences between the struct and namespace methods:

    • The struct method will require all of the interface classes contained to be declared in the same file. The namespace can be added to in multiple files. In other words: you can have several files extending the namespace ComponentContainer, which you cannot do with the struct
    • Someone may try to instantiate the wrapping struct and do things with it. Someone may even be tempted to add functionality to the wrapping struct
    • You can have “using” statements on the namespace – I’m not sure if that will actually work for the struct.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.