Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7849383
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T18:30:06+00:00 2026-06-02T18:30:06+00:00

We have a discrepancy in our development and production content servers (11g) in the

  • 0

We have a discrepancy in our development and production content servers (11g) in the
way that expired content is automatically handled.
– In dev, the original file is deleted and replaced with a file of the same
name, except with a “~1” appended to the end of the web location. The original
file is no longer available from it’s original web location.
– In production, the same process occurs, but the original file is still
accessible via the original web location, which indicates it was not deleted.

It’s been a struggle to track down the source of this configuration. Is this an
out-of-the-box feature, or does this have to be configured on it’s own?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T18:30:08+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 6:30 pm

    Yes, this functionality is the out-of-the-box feature.
    By default each content item’s revision has meta-field ‘Expiration Date’ which defines when expiration will occur.

    Expired content revisions are marked correspondingly in the database (revisions.dstatus=’EXPIRED’) thus they will not be accessible in application via search, but can still be found by administrator (Content Management -> Expired Content).

    Expired revision files are not deleted from weblayout, but renamed instead as not latest revisions – marked with ~{number} postfix.
    Expired revision files are neither deleted from vault nor renamed.

    Lets say we have 2 revisions (dID=31026 and dID=31025) of a picture 009139 (dDocName=009139). Both revisions are expired. In this case:

    • both revisions are marked as expired in DB:
    DID                    DDOCNAME                       DSTATUS              
    ---------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------- 
    31026                  UP_009139                      EXPIRED              
    31025                  UP_009139                      EXPIRED  
    • both revision files will be renamed in weblayout:
    \ucm\weblayout\groups\public\@test\documents\multimedia\up_009139~1.gif 
    \ucm\weblayout\groups\public\@test\documents\multimedia\up_009139~2.jpg
    • neither revision 1 nor revision 2 will be renamed/deleted in vault:
    \ucm\vault\multimedia\@test\31025.gif
    \ucm\vault\multimedia\@test\31026.jpg
    

    Regarding your issue with prod – make sure you had no further revisions after the expired one (in this case this revision will be, of course, available)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's the situation: I have a bit of graphical content inside a symbol that
i seem to have a discrepancy between production's gem path when I installed manually
Have a SomeLib.pro file that contains: CONFIG += debug TEMPLATE = lib TARGET =
Have a matrix report now that has Position, Hours and Wages for a location
Programs used: SQL Server 2000, Excel 2003 We have a table in our database
I would have dared say that the numeric values computed by Fortran and C++
I am an architect for a software development team. I have built a sizeable
Hi all, I seem to have found a discrepancy when testing ASP.NET applications locally
I have two pages that use the flot jquery plugin, and they both work
I have a virtual class that has been derived from a non virtual class.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.