Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 954771
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T00:16:15+00:00 2026-05-16T00:16:15+00:00

We have a hardware system with some FPGA’s and an FTDI USB controller. The

  • 0

We have a hardware system with some FPGA’s and an FTDI USB controller. The hardware streams data over USB bulk transfer to the PC at around 5MB/s and the software is tasked with staying in sync, checking the CRC and writing the data to file.

The FTDI chip has a ‘busy’ pin which goes high while its waiting for the PC to do its business. There is a limited amount of buffering in the FTDI and elsewhere on the hardware.

The busy line is going high for longer than the hardware can buffer (50-100ms) so we are losing data. To save us from having to re-design the hardware I have been asked to ‘fix’ this issue!

I think my code is quick enough as we’ve had it running up to 15MB/s, so that leaves an IO bottleneck somewhere. Are we just expecting too much from the PC/OS?

Here is my data entry point. Occasionally we get a dropped bit or byte. If the checksum doesn’t compute, I shift through until it does. byte[] data is nearly always 4k.

    void ftdi_OnData(byte[] data)
    {
        List<byte> buffer = new List<byte>(data.Length);
        int index = 0;

        while ((index + rawFile.Header.PacketLength + 1) < data.Length)
        {
            if (CheckSum.CRC16(data, index, rawFile.Header.PacketLength + 2)) // <- packet length + 2 for 16bit checksum
            {
                buffer.AddRange(data.SubArray<byte>(index, rawFile.Header.PacketLength));                 
                index += rawFile.Header.PacketLength + 2; // <- skip the two checksums, we dont want to save them...
            }
            else
            {
                index++; // shift through
            }
        }

        rawFile.AddData(buffer.ToArray(), 0, buffer.Count);
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T00:16:16+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:16 am

    Tip: do not write to a file…. queue.

    Modern computers have multiple processors. If you want certain things as fast as possible, use multiple processors.

    • Have on thread deal with the USB data, check checksums etc. It queues (ONLY) the results to a thread safe queue.
    • Another thread reads data from the queue and writes it to a file, possibly buffered.

    Finished 😉

    100ms is a lot of time for decent operations. I have successfully managed around 250.000 IO data packets per second (financial data) using C# without a sweat.

    Basically, make sure your IO threads do ONLY that and use your internal memory as buffer. Especially dealing with hardware on one end the thread doing that should ONLY do that, POSSIBLY if needed running in high priority.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.