Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3879450
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T22:43:41+00:00 2026-05-19T22:43:41+00:00

We have a homebrew type that we have been using since .NET 3.5 where

  • 0

We have a homebrew type that we have been using since .NET 3.5 where I work that does the same thing as Lazy< T > class yet allows you to have the instance re-evaluate the Lazy Func. We would like to replace our class with the new .NET one but this Clear() or IsDirty mechanism doesn’t exist.

Is there a way to reinitialize the Lazy< T > Func method without reinstantiating the class? If not, is there a way to implement it as an extension method or is just just a bad pattern to follow in the first place?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T22:43:41+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 10:43 pm

    Because it is impossible to make it thread-safe. Classes that guarantee that the programmer will shoot his leg off without any way to fix the problem don’t belong in a framework. You are free to shoot your own leg off.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been trying to install Git using Homebrew on OSX Lion for over
I have been trying to install the R language with homebrew but when I
I have been experimenting with the devkitARM toolchain for NDS homebrew recently. Something I
I am trying ti use carrierWave. I have installed imagemagic using homebrew and both
I tried installing rabbitmq using homebrew. I have a MBP i7 and it is
I have a PHP script that is using wget to download some images. However,
Rails and all my gem files + homebrew installs have been working fine up
I have a standard homebrew install inside of usr/local/ When I try: Larson-2:~ larson$
Have a SomeLib.pro file that contains: CONFIG += debug TEMPLATE = lib TARGET =
Have a matrix report now that has Position, Hours and Wages for a location

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.