Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3988356
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T06:14:32+00:00 2026-05-20T06:14:32+00:00

We have a hudson setup with just one executor. we want to get to

  • 0

We have a hudson setup with just one executor. we want to get to a point where we can have at least 2 executors. The problem that is stopping us from doing this is a job which cannot be run in parallel.

Explanation:
we have many svn branches configured on hudson. The flow for a particular branch will look like

A->B->C

In this flow, B writes and deletes data from oracle. we are good, if there is only one branch set up on hudson.

But, we have many svn branches on Hudson. So there could be a another branch with the flow

A1->B1-C1

Now B and B1 both write and delete data from the only oracle instance running on the hudson box, so we are cautious about any data getting messed up, that would be used by the tests . So we don’t want to have 2 executors for hudson, which could lead to B and B1 running at the same time.

So is there a solution to this problem?
Can I configure Hudson, not to run B and B1 in parallel, otherwise run two jobs in parallel?

Thanks in Advance

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T06:14:32+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 6:14 am

    What you can do is create a slave for each different project. You can call them SlaveA, SlaveB and SlaveC. Have them all launch on the same server (main hudson server) with a single executor.

    Now for each branch that you have for A,A1,A2.. you can have them build only on SlaveA so that forces thread confinement between each project.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have just setup our hudson server to build .NET projects which seems to
I have such a situation : one hudson job for one project that is
I have just set up Hudson on my server. For some reason, my build
In Hudson we have a job that deploys a specified subversion tag to a
I have a job in Hudson that builds on a Windows XP slave. I
I have a script that appends some rows to a table. One of the
We have svn+ssh setup on non-standard port. We added svn+ssh credential in Hudson, when
I would like to have Hudson do builds one way if they were triggered
Have just started using Google Chrome , and noticed in parts of our site,
Have just started using Visual Studio Professional's built-in unit testing features, which as I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.