Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7644953
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T09:48:55+00:00 2026-05-31T09:48:55+00:00

We have a large library that makes a lot of HTTP calls using HttpWebRequest

  • 0

We have a large library that makes a lot of HTTP calls using HttpWebRequest to get data. Rewriting this library to make use of async calls with the HTTPClient would be a bear. So, I was wondering if I could create async controllers that use a taskfactory to call into our library and whether the calls that are ultimately made via the WebClient would be asynch or they would still be synch. Are there any problems/side-effects I might cause by trying to mix async with the old HttpWebRequest?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T09:48:57+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 9:48 am

    If I’m understanding what you’re proposing the answer is: no, changing the services the client talks to to be async would not help. The client would still block a CPU thread while the I/O is outstanding with the server, whether the server is async or not.

    There’s no reason to switch away from HttpWebRequest. You can use TaskFactory::FromAsync in .NET 4.0 to call HttpWebRequest::BeginGetResponse. That looks something like this:

    WebRequest myWebRequest = WebRequest.Create("http://www.stackoverflow.com");
    
    Task<WebResponse> getResponseTask = Task<WebResponse>.Factory.FromAsync(
                                                    myWebRequest.BeginGetResponse,
                                                    myWebRequest.EndGetResponse,
                                                    null);
    
    getResponseTask.ContinueWith(getResponseAntecedent =>
    {
       WebResponse webResponse = getResponseAntecedent.Result;
    
       Stream webResponseStream = webResponse.GetResponseStream();
    
       // read from stream async too... eventually dispose of it
    });
    

    In .NET 4.5 you can still continue to use HttpWebRequest and use the new GetResponseAsync method with the new await features in C# to make life a heck of a lot easier:

    WebRequest myWebRequest = WebRequest.Create("http://www.stackoverflow.com");
    
    using(WebResponse webResponse = await myWebRequest.GetResponseAsync())
    using(Stream webResponseStream = webResponse.GetResponseStream())
    {
         // read from stream async, etc.
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the source for a large (>250 files) library that makes heavy use
I have an Erlang app which makes a large number of http client calls
We have started using the boost unit testing library for a large existing code
I have a large data set of GPS collar locations that have a varying
I have an native C++ library which makes use of a large static buffer
I'm quite stumped on this issue. I have a large library of H.264 mp4
I have a project which uses a large library residing in its own repository.
I am writing a fairly large C++ shared-object library, and have run into a
I have large data sets (10 Hz data, so 864k points per 24 Hours)
I have large batches of XHTML files that are manually updated. During the review

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.