Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3491146
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T11:36:07+00:00 2026-05-18T11:36:07+00:00

We have a .net service with simple commands (play, pause, next track, for example).

  • 0

We have a .net service with simple commands (play, pause, next track, for example). This is installed on users’ workstation’s with its own credentials (FooServiceUser, for example). If I want to give the users an app that can send the commands to the service, what would be the most lightweight way to do so? Remember I only want to send commands from a single workstation to a process running on that same workstation. The commands are very simple. Also the app needs to receive status from the service. ie paused, playing track 21.

Should be easy right? WCF looks complicated and overkill. Everyone on SO is saying .net remoting is bad. I don’t want to install MSMQ. Every mention of sockets gets a negative score.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T11:36:07+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 11:36 am

    For a complete, easy to use solution I would recommend WCF. It supports a memory-channel protocol (ICP) for just this application.

    Remains what you would call ‘light-weight’. The hosting part of WCF can be accomplished in about 5 lines of code. All client-side code is generated. So do you really care about the number and size of the assemblies you have to use (already installed) or the amount of features you’re going to ignore?

    Just use WCF.
    And it will let you easily scale out to sockets and inter-PC if the need ever arises.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.