Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 400265
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:55:34+00:00 2026-05-12T16:55:34+00:00

We have a project and are about to add a new piece of functionality

  • 0

We have a project and are about to add a new piece of functionality to otherwise stable codebase without any major changes going on except defect fixing. The plan is not develop the new feature separately for a while (probably a month) doing intermediate builds and testing and as the feature is finished and the quality is acceptable merge the code of the new feature in the main branch.

The question is what of the following two scenarios is better in terms of Clear Case:

  1. Creating a new project based on a baseline in the integration stream of the current project, developing the new feature in this separate project with intermediate deliveries to the integration stream of the new project and build from the integration stream. And eventually delivering the changes from the integration stream of the new project to the main project (to dev or int).

  2. Using a hierarchy of streams in the main project: creating a child stream of the integration stream in the main project (lets call it temp_int) and a child stream of temp_int (lets call it temp_dev). Developing the new feature in temp_dev, with periodic deliveries to temp_int and builds from temp_int and then delivering the new feature from temp_int to the main integration stream.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:55:35+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:55 pm

    The question whether you need to create a new project or make a sub-stream is a classical one.

    In my opinion, both options are fairly equivalent.

    The only significant difference is the foundation baseline you will be able to pick when creating a new stream for this particular development effort:

    • for a sub-stream, you will only be able to select a baseline produced on the parent stream.
    • for the main stream of a new project, you will be able to select any baseline you want.

    Other than that:

    • a new project offer a new space for isolating several stream in a coherent container. But if you need to include some of minor evolutions of the stable code done during the new feature development, delivers will be in order.
    • a sub-stream allows to clearly visualize the end-client once the development are finished: the deliver will be a natural operation for merging to the parent stream. Plus, periodic rebase are possible from the parent stream to your development stream in order to keep it up-to-date.

    So if you have only one stream with a clear deliver to make, the sub-stream option is enough.
    If your development ends up being more complicated than foreseen, a project is nicer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We've had a a client add a new requirement to a project we're about
My project is about a school admin I have a page called : createClass.php,
I have a scene in my WPF project with about 2000 different user controls:
We have a project that’s using many C++11 facilities, and we thought about this
In my current project I have data about colors. Each color is either a
I have a Java project that needs a addon interface. I was thinking about
I'm about to walk into a project that will have files (mostly PHP) behind
I have a .Net winforms project with a short time table (about a week
I am thinking about using Gears in a project, but I have doubts about
I have a pure Actionscript 3 project, using flash.* libraries, compiles down to about

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.