Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 533259
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:29:26+00:00 2026-05-13T09:29:26+00:00

We have a small framework written in C# .Net 2.0 that we want to

  • 0

We have a small framework written in C# .Net 2.0 that we want to expose to COM.

Problem is, we have some generic classes that would be exposed as the following:

interface IOurClass
{
  ReadonlyCollection<IOurListObject> OurCollection
  {
    get;
  }
}

interface IOurListObject
{
  //Some properties that don't matter
}

What is the best (or recommended way) to expose generic collections to COM? We do not have to support generics, we just need to somehow expose a collection of IOurListObject.

We also would like to avoid having to write a new class for every collection we use, but it may not be possible.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:29:27+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:29 am

    It is not possible to expose generic collections (or any other thing that is ‘generic’) to COM.

    So, I suggest that you create a non-generic property (or method) in your COM-visible interface.
    This method could return an array of ‘IOurListObject’ items.
    In your class, you could implement this method explicitly, so that it does not show up in your intellisense when you refer to the object directly outside COM, for instance.

    I hope I make myself a bit clear.

    Example:

    [ComVisible(true)]
    public interface IOurClass
    {
        IOurListObject[] OurCollection { get; }
    }
    
    public class OurClass : IOurClass
    {
        IOurListObject[] IOurClass.OurCollection { get { return OurCollection.ToArray();} }
    
        public ReadOnlyCollection<IOurListObject> OurCollection { ... }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a script that appends some rows to a table. One of the
I have a project that adds elements to an AutoCad drawing. I noticed that
I have a new web app that is packaged as a WAR as part
Let say I have the following desire, to simplify the IConvertible's to allow me
I have several USB mass storage flash drives connected to a Ubuntu Linux computer
I have a snippet to create a 'Like' button for our news site: <iframe
I have found this example on StackOverflow: var people = new List<Person> { new
I have a login.jsp page which contains a login form. Once logged in the
There doesn't seem to be any tried and true set of best practices to
I am using a 3rd-party rotator object, which is providing a smooth, random rotation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.