Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 801921
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T23:31:05+00:00 2026-05-14T23:31:05+00:00

We have a strange situation where we lose a Stateless SessionBean in a Bean

  • 0

We have a strange situation where we lose a Stateless SessionBean in a Bean Pool in Weblogic 10.3.0. Since we only have one bean in the pool, this effectively hangs all incoming calls. We do not want more than one instance in the pool because of application restrictions.

In the Weblogic admin console, we can see that there is 1 instance in the bean pool, 0 beans in use, and 1 waiting incoming request. The question is, why doesn’t the system send the request to the one obviously free bean instance?

This happens after several hours and over 100,000 incoming requests, and the same scenario worked fine in the old weblogic 8 environment.

We get the following stack trace:

   "[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '5' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" waiting for lock java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@b0d484 TIMED_WAITING

            sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)

            java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:198)

            java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2054)

            weblogic.ejb.container.pool.StatelessSessionPool.waitForBean(StatelessSessionPool.java:269)

            weblogic.ejb.container.pool.StatelessSessionPool.getBean(StatelessSessionPool.java:111)

            weblogic.ejb.container.manager.StatelessManager.preInvoke(StatelessManager.java:148)

            weblogic.ejb.container.internal.BaseRemoteObject.preInvoke(BaseRemoteObject.java:227)

            weblogic.ejb.container.internal.StatelessRemoteObject.preInvoke(StatelessRemoteObject.java:52)

            com.mycompany.beans.MessageLogFacace_n73y0z_EOImpl.isMyStuffValid(MessageLogFacace_n73y0z_EOImpl.java:261)

            com.mycompany.beans.MessageLogFacace_n73y0z_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)

            weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:589)

            weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:230)

            weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:477)

            weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)

            weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(Unknown Source)

            weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:473)

            weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118)

            weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)

            weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)

Any help would be very welcome.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T23:31:06+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 11:31 pm

    This is a known issue in Oracle and they have a patch for this issue. Contact Oracle support to get the patch.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a strange situation in one view controller where this line crashes in
There is this strange situation I'm fighting on. I have 3 pages, les call
Strange situation. inside a solution I have several projects. One of them is called
I guess this is strange situation. I have a results table which contain 100k
I'm experiencing this strange situation. I have a UITableView where, when the user selects
I have a strange situation with my web service. It is a simple one
Trying my hand with jQuery. I have this strange situation that i wish to
I have a strange situation. Try double clicking on Insane on this fiddle .
I have a quite strange situation. I have this very simple package: Task get
I have a strange situation in regards to xml serialization... If I run MyApp.exe

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.