Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 108461
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T01:54:55+00:00 2026-05-11T01:54:55+00:00

We have an application that will be collecting data and storing it in local

  • 0

We have an application that will be collecting data and storing it in local WinXP PCs using Microsoft SQL Server Compact. We want to aggregate that data up to a single full-blown SQL Server for reporting and archival. The data transport needs to be fairly continuous (i.e. not batched) though some latency is acceptable (a minute or two max).

Data is a one-way push from the collectors to the server. Collectors never need to know what other collectors are doing and the primary server will never be updating data back on the collector. Current plans are for 5 collectors, but it’s essentially unbounded for scalability.

We have to assume we’ll be ‘mostly connected’ but we cannot guarantee the connection from the collectors to the server. If the server or network go down, we’ll still be collecting and data will get pushed back up when the server is again reachable.

Ideally we’d like a solution that a non-programming engineer could set up once we’ve done the infrastructure work. So we’re fine writing some code and wizards, but the end user cannot be assumed to know anything about writing code, though they will have reasonable technical computer literacy.

Right now we have two technology candidates for this:

  1. SQL Replication
  2. Microsoft Sync Services

We have little experience with the first, but we know that setting up subscriptions, etc in SQL Server is painful and debugging them is not fun, so we’re trying to find an alternative.

We know almost nothing of #2, only that it’s been suggested as an alternative for getting device data to a server.

Does anyone have experience in this type of a scenario or with either/both of these technologies or anything we’re not thought of that they can share? SQL Compact on the collectors is a fixed requirement. SQL Server on the server is not required, but desired since the customer already has it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T01:54:56+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:54 am

    I ended up going with option 3: neither. Instead we just periodically (user adjustable, but defaults to 5 seconds) use the SqlBulkCopy class to copy the records across. This works well becasue it allows us to pass in an IDataReader, so we locally open the table using TableDirect, seek to the highest RowID from the remote table, then pass the reader to the WriteToServer class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 261k
  • Answers 261k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I hope I got it right: This is because id… May 13, 2026 at 11:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Short answer: No, there shouldn't be any runtime performance impact.… May 13, 2026 at 11:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, there are not. You can hack it by doing… May 13, 2026 at 11:40 am

Related Questions

I am working on a solution that aims at solving problems that newbie programmers
I am working on a basic Struts based application that is experience major spikes
For example I have the following tables resulting from: CREATE TABLE A (Id int,
We have a part of an application where, say, 20% of the time it

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.