Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 604177
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:00:37+00:00 2026-05-13T17:00:37+00:00

We have an stub that we are launching from inittab that execv’s our process.

  • 0

We have an stub that we are launching from inittab that execv’s our process. (ARM Linux Kernel 2.6.25)

When testing the process it fails only if launched from inittab and execv’d. If launched on the command line it work perfectly, every time.

The process makes heavy use of SYS V IPC.

Are there any differences between the two launch methods that I should be aware of?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:00:37+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:00 pm

    Was a mismatched kernel/library issue. Everything cleaned up after a full recompile.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Our Windows file server has an archive service installed that stubs files that have
I'm updating my code generator and have a choice between implementing a method stub
Have just started using Google Chrome , and noticed in parts of our site,
Have just started using Visual Studio Professional's built-in unit testing features, which as I
I have a test that passes if I am not debugging the test: Snippet:
I have an containing a list of divs that jQuery turns into progress bars.
I have the following class structure that I need to unit test: public interface
I have CameraList class that provides Cameras list like SONY,VIVOTEK,VIVOTEK 7XXX,PIXORD,TOSHIBA,JVC E-CON... And I
I have an extended ImageView that I'm reusing 7 times horizontally (within a LinearLayout)
The problem is that I have two listView but one itemClick method, if I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.