Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 265183
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:44:52+00:00 2026-05-11T22:44:52+00:00

We have business restriction in accessing the database only through stored procedure calls. Caching

  • 0

We have business restriction in accessing the database only through stored procedure calls. Caching is also not allowed. Is there value in using Hibernate framework where in you are not using the features like building object relationship based complex queries or caching? We are using considering using the lightweight jdbc option.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:44:52+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:44 pm

    Hibernate makes sense if you’re going to map objects to tables. I don’t see how HQL can benefit you otherwise.

    I would look into JDBC or Spring JDBC instead.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a business requirement that calls for an end user to be able
I have a business user who tried his hand at writing his own SQL
I have a business case whereby I need to be able to specify my
I have a business logic classes that are written in pure C# (without any
I have some business objects which use: Web.Configuration.WebConfigurationManager.AppSettings.Item(SomeSetting) Now that I'm breaking those objects
If I have a business object with 50 fields, and I need to populate
A lot of the time I will have a Business object that has a
Here's my problem at a high level: We have two business applications. App1 inputs
I’m having a little Architecture problem. In my project I have a Business Logic
I have a repeatable business process that I execute every week as part of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.