We have just completed implementing a successful but problematic project. We want to get a customer representative to travel on site to hold a face to face project retrospective, however we are currently struggling to convince management of the benefits of having the customer on site to have this retrospective.
Does anyone have experience to provide decent justifications to why this would better to be held on site?
Project post mortem (or post partum, if you’d like to use a more optimistic term) meetings involving customers are good for business.
First, the purely business aspects. Assuming you want to retain the customer and continue to work for them, involving a customer representative in the meeting has several positive effects:
Even if you aren’t interested in doing business with this customer in the future, as long as the relationship is not overly acrimonious, it can still be beneficial to have a customer representative at the meeting:
This kind of meeting needs to be led by someone who’s tactful and forceful. You need to create an open atmosphere but also make sure that criticism doesn’t become personal or hurtful. You need to lay out the ground rules up front and enforce them with an iron fist, to make sure the meeting remains on a productive, positive level. It’s good to start the meeting out with a statement like:
It’s often a good idea to invite all participants to dinner after the meeting. You can celebrate the successful end of the project and continue to cement the team feeling between your group and the customer.