Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8588603
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T22:50:41+00:00 2026-06-11T22:50:41+00:00

We have our 1.0 on which work is beeing done on and our version

  • 0

We have our 1.0 on which work is beeing done on and our version 2.0 with even more check-ins and changes. Is there any way to keep them in sync?

We have all kind of changes:

  • 1.0 changes only
  • 2.0 changes only
  • changes for both

The problem is that the code base for 1.0 and 2.0 will differ more and more over time and merging will become a nightmare as both versions mature.

I think simple release branches are not applicable for us because it feels like a Main/Trunk branch is not existent. We can´t merge different behaviors in one single branch.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T22:50:42+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm

    We decided not to use branching at all.
    We use feature toggles instead for the migration time and delete the toggles afterwards.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any way by which we can have a hangout session within our
We have our own custom calendar in our portal which is developed in Java.
We have a part of our program which can save a diagnostic file for
We have a script right now which our Windows users run on a Linux
We have the +1 Button on our website which is available in different languages.
I have a linux vm which is our testing machine. as part of some
We have for all our tests a method which starts a Jetty Server to
We have just setup our hudson server to build .NET projects which seems to
In our project we have UI and logic (which may be represented as a
In our organization we have some projects which are (by policy) open to all

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.