Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7064083
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T04:47:27+00:00 2026-05-28T04:47:27+00:00

We have pool of MSVS solutions (Solution A, B, C, … ) that share

  • 0

We have pool of MSVS solutions (Solution “A”, “B”, “C”, … ) that share basic functionality in assembly called “Common.dll”.

There are 3-5 active solutions (that are under developing) while others are passive and hardly ever be rebuilt.

Common.dll is always under developing. There are several options how to keep my solutions code, what will you suggest and why?

A). Put common.dll source code to every solution. Pros: it will help active solutions to grow with common.dll side-by-side while passive solutions will be compilable. Cons: it’s hard to synchronize active common.dll code between active solutions

B). Put common.dll binary code to every solution. Pros: all projects will be compilable while common.dll code will be centralized. Cons: it’s hard to grow active solutions side-by-side with common.dll

C). Reference every project to last common.dll binaries looks like B. but it’ll bring problems with passive solutions if common.dll will grow and change it’s interfaces (some may say interfaces should always stay constant)

D). ?

Thank you in advance!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T04:47:28+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:47 am

    We practice something mostly like B.

    A CI server makes sure that the common libraries are always up-to-date (even if they use other common libraries themselfes). Each solution which uses common libraries has a “Lib” folder where we put the build artefacts, but these are not under source control (in contrast to external artefacts, such as the ones imported though NuGet).

    So while developing you don’t get problems because of breaking changes in the common libs and the developer chooses the point in time when he upgrades (but he always has to do that before he commits to the central repo).

    The CI server will always copy the latest common libraries into the “Lib” of the solution under build, so that the latest common libraries are integrated. If we need to create a build with old libraries (specific hotfix release – very rare), we can always use the build artefacts with the matching date. Normal patch/fix releases are usually also upgraded to the latest common libraries though.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does Python have a pool of all strings and are they (strings) singletons there?
I have a custom thread pool class, that creates some threads that each wait
I currently have code that does the following: private final static ExecutorService pool =
Say I have a pool of enumerables that I want to group by an
i have big pool of core date objects (around 10000) and there is too
Hello stack overflowers, I have a desing that uses the flyweight pattern to share
I have some c3p0 pool encapsulated in a class that I use to execute
In my real application, I have a VB6 DLL which is called from classic
I know that WebMatrix does not have Pool concepts, but can I put my
I have a thread pool and I use a library that if certain conditions

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.