Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6002427
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T00:58:35+00:00 2026-05-23T00:58:35+00:00

We have recently migrated to Git from SVN. We have setup a bare repository

  • 0

We have recently migrated to Git from SVN. We have setup a bare repository on one machine in our LAN network and cloned on other machines. Now when anyone do the changes and commits we want that he sends the pull request to the bare repo (by telling or emailing or any other way) after that one will go through the changes and pull it on bare repository (same as it works on GitHub).

Do we need to install any interface or there is some commands in Git itself?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T00:58:36+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 12:58 am

    Both Git (the software) and GitHub (the web service) have a concept called “pull request”, and unfortunately they are not exactly the same thing.

    Native Git

    The native Git request-pull command has a very short manual page with the following one-sentence description:

    Summarizes the changes between two commits to the standard output, and includes the given URL in the generated summary.

    This is a fairly low-level command that generates a short summary of changes that is suitable for posting to a mailing list. Other users can use the URL published in this “pull request” to manually pull changes into their own repository.

    GitHub Pull Requests

    When using the GitHub web service, a Pull Request is a full-featured interactive collaboration tool. A GitHub pull request has:

    • a more detailed description of the changes than just the individual commit summaries
    • notifications automatically sent to users who have chosen to watch the project
    • an online review interface where others can comment on proposed changes
    • discussion comments for recording conversations about commits
    • central management of pull requests so they won’t get lost

    It is worth noting that Linus has his own opinion on the relative utility of these two features.

    Conclusion

    The two “pull request” features described above are similar in spirit but completely different in implementation. In particular, the git request-pull command cannot be used to create a new Pull Request on GitHub. You have several choices if you want to support “pull request” type functionality:

    • Use GitHub. This definitely involves the least effort, but if your project is not public you’ll have to pay GitHub to host a private repository. Some people might not be comfortable with this choice.
    • Use Gerrit. Gerrit is an open-source server program you can download that provides many features similar to those available in GitHub. It is especially well suited to collaborative code reviews.
    • Use git request-pull and a mailing list. Using this method requires a lot more discipline from your engineers, as it’s easy to misplace or mishandle mailing list messages. There is no central accountability associated with this method.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have a 3.5 Gb SVN repository recently migrated from a 6 Gb one.
We have recently upgraded one of our applications from Java 1.4 to Java 6.
We have recently migrated a large, high demand web application to Tomcat 5.5 from
I recently migrated an older application we have at work from Java 1.5 to
I'm a Git newbie. I recently moved a Rails project from Subversion to Git.
We have recently migrated some 30 DTS packages in SQL Server 2000 to SSIS
We have recently migrated Oracle 6i forms with a native runtime to 10g to
We have a website which we recently migrated to ASP.NET MVC. All of the
I have recently installed Ubuntu Linux on my machine. This machine is on pretty
I have recently added the reCaptcha library for CodeIgniter (by copying files from the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.