Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 506491
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T06:42:24+00:00 2026-05-13T06:42:24+00:00

We have tables with more then 3m records. When using innerjoin it is much

  • 0

We have tables with more then 3m records. When using innerjoin it is much slower then select * from db1,db2 where db1.field=db2.field

Any thoughts?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T06:42:25+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:42 am

    SELECT * from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id

    is equivalent to

    SELECT * from t1 INNER JOIN t2 on t1.id = t2.id.

    However, if there are other criteria for the SQL query, then the behaviour may differ. For instance.

    SELECT * from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id and t1.col1 is not null;

    can be written in two different ways with the INNER JOIN:

    SELECT * from t1 INNER JOIN t2 on t1.id = t2.id and t1.col1 is not null

    or

    SELECT * from t1 INNER JOIN t2 on t1.id = t2.id
    WHERE t1.col1 is not null

    This may or may not end up being the same query (according to the optimiser), and the complexity of the other parts of the query. The EXPLAIN PLAN will tell you if you are executing the same query.

    Why are the above queries different? Because the restriction on not null is done at different stages of the query, which may have an impact on the performance, or even on the number of rows returned.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 270k
  • Answers 270k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you're using JDBC, use a PreparedStatement. This class will… May 13, 2026 at 1:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I've used them to keep track of Undo and Redo… May 13, 2026 at 1:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you sure it's not a server caching issue? Open… May 13, 2026 at 1:31 pm

Related Questions

I have an sql query with inner joins of four tables that takes more
I am confused where should I start to design a star schema. for example
I'm getting back into .NET development after a couple years and it seems that
I have been dancing around this issue for awhile but it keeps coming up.
I have a table in a SQL Server 2005 Database that is used a

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.