Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 745185
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T09:03:55+00:00 2026-05-14T09:03:55+00:00

We have the following piece of code (idea for this code was found on

  • 0

We have the following piece of code (idea for this code was found on this website) which will spawn new threads for the method “Do_SomeWork()”. This enables us to run the method multiple times asynchronously.

The code is:

    var numThreads = 20;
    var toProcess = numThreads;

    var resetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);

    for (var i = 0; i < numThreads; i++)
    {
        new Thread(delegate()
        {
            Do_SomeWork(Parameter1, Parameter2, Parameter3);
            if (Interlocked.Decrement(ref toProcess) == 0) resetEvent.Set();
        }).Start();
    }

    resetEvent.WaitOne();

However we would like to make use of ThreadPool rather than create our own new threads which can be detrimental to performance. The question is how can we modify the above code to make use of ThreadPool keeping in mind that the method “Do_SomeWork” takes multiple parameters and also has a return type (i.e. method is not void).

Also, this is C# 2.0.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T09:03:56+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:03 am

    Pretty much the same way, but use a WaitCallback passed to ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem:

    var numThreads = 20;
    var toProcess = numThreads;
    
    var resetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
    
    for (var i = 0; i < numThreads; i++)
    {
        ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem (
            new WaitCallback(delegate(object state) {
            Do_SomeWork(Parameter1, Parameter2, Parameter3);
            if (Interlocked.Decrement(ref toProcess) == 0) resetEvent.Set();
        }), null);
    }
    
    resetEvent.WaitOne();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.