Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3947014
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T01:12:06+00:00 2026-05-20T01:12:06+00:00

We have the problem of a large automated suite of integration tests. While our

  • 0

We have the “problem” of a large automated suite of integration tests. While our build times are reasonable (< 1 hour), the tests typically take > 6 hours to complete.

While it’s great to have this large chunk of functionality tested in our build runs, it obviously is a barrier to implementing CI, which I’ve found to be a very helpful for keeping source trees in a “always buildable” state.

I’ve reviewed threads of discussion like this one, which elaborate on the distinctions.

This leads me to a few questions:

  1. Does CI dictate or recommend Unit vs. Integration testing automation? I’ve heard Unit-only in the past, but am not finding any such statements (or rationale) for this in a quick search.

  2. What is a good “best practice” for combined build + automated test times/ratios to have effective CI for a team? My gut tells me that this should be < 2 hours as a worst case, and probably < 1 hour to be really effective. In theory, we could break up the tests to run in parallel and probably get them running in under 2 hours, but this would still be a 3 hour run.

  3. What’s the best way forward from long-running Nightly Builds + Integration Tests to CI? I’m thinking of a CI build with a few skeletal Unit Tests only, in combination with nightly builds that continue with the integration tests.

Any tooling recommendations are also welcome (Windows-only C#/C++ codebase)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T01:12:07+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 1:12 am

    For most projects, however, the XP
    guideline of a ten minute build is
    perfectly within reason. Most of our
    modern projects achieve this.
    It’s
    worth putting in concentrated effort
    to make it happen, because every
    minute you reduce off the build time
    is a minute saved for each developer
    every time they commit. Since CI
    demands frequent commits, this adds up
    to a lot of time.

    Source:
    http://martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html#KeepTheBuildFast

    Why does it takes 6 hours? How many tests do you have? What are the ratio of the unit-test compared to integrated ones? You probrably have many more integrated tests or your unit-test are not really unit. Are your unit tests touching the DB? This may be the problem.

    6 hours is a long long time. The article above has some tips.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a problem with executing large number of queries. I need to execute
I have a problem when downloading a large file (around 400mb) with a web
I have a problem when try to use hashtable with large data. I have
I have a problem with a memory leak in a very large ASP.NET application.
I have a large project that executes without problem when not debugging (even when
i have large numbers of text files and i am in problem that i
I have a rather large project whose Installer is written using NSIS. My problem
I need some help in solving this problem. We have a large amount of
I have a problem saving large (f.e. 12 000 x 9 000 ) images.
I have a problem loading a kernel module, there is a large data structure,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.