Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 426689
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T19:30:16+00:00 2026-05-12T19:30:16+00:00

We include a 3rd Party lib+DLL that recently causes a lot of trouble on

  • 0

We include a 3rd Party lib+DLL that recently causes a lot of trouble on installations. Using dependencywalker, we found that the dll itself refers to two different Versions of

MSVCR80.DLL:
Version 8.0.50727.4053 and
Version 8.0.50727.42

alt text http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/1734/dependencywalk2.jpg

In MOST cases installation makes no problems, even if we distribute none of both versions. But in a number of cases our installation just does not start. We then find messages in the windows system event log from the SideBySide manger: “Version of DLL does not match”. In most cases again this problem can be resolved, by installing the .NET framework (although we do not use this). But now we have a case where this does not help.

I know that a solution would be, to install both versions as a shared assembly, but that seems not to be easy, and besides that i would prefer a much simpler solution. Does anybody know a workaround?

Can i somehow use only one version of the Dll?

EDIT:
I now tried cristians advice:

D:\Develop\LEADTOOLS15\patch_maifest>mt.exe -inputresource:ltkrn15u.dll;#1 -out:old.manifest
Microsoft (R) Manifest Tool version 5.2.3790.2075
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation 2005.
All rights reserved.

mt.exe : general error c101008c: Failed to read the manifest from the resource of file "ltkrn15u.dll". Ressource not found.

If i view the dlls dependencies with full paths, i see the following:
alt text http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/4122/dependencywalk3.jpg

The lower MSVCR80.DLL is the one withe Version …42. I dont understand this. Why does MSVCP80.DLL refer to a different Version of MSVCR80.DLL than the one besides it. Is that maybe a problem of the dependencywalker ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T19:30:16+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:30 pm

    Your best option is to ship the needed DLLs within your applications installer package. Use at least the version that your 3rd party DLL depends on.

    Microsoft offers standalone installers for its runtime DLLs (vcredits_*). The latest version for VisualStudio 2005 can be downloaded here. That is also the version that your DLL is linked against. You can silently launch the redistributable package from your installer.

    As a manual workaround for already installed systems, simply apply the redist installer on the target machine.

    If you choose this method, you don’t need to be afraid of version conflicts, as applications depending on an older versions will be redirected to always use the most recent one.

    For a better understanding you have look at this MSDN articles.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.