Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8408457
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T23:38:13+00:00 2026-06-09T23:38:13+00:00

We just installed a mass filer device that we want to store data from

  • 0

We just installed a mass filer device that we want to store data from our suppliers on. They FTP files to it every day and right now, we’ve about 60,000+ files.

Doing find . -name '*TXT' -exec ls '{}' \; | wc -l will work albeit very slowly.

Is there a faster way to count files?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T23:38:14+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 11:38 pm

    Why not just

    find . -name '*TXT' | wc -l
    

    ? Your current command is unnecessarily spawning ls for each file, and that process spawning in itself will be very slow. A quick test on my system would suggest a 40x speed up.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just installed Python 2.7.3 on a Windows7 machine. How do I get .py files
I just installed AnkhSVN to have subversion support from within Visual Studio 2010. I
Just installed SL5 and the toolkit, that were released few days ago. The bug
I just installed Ruboto-irb on my Android device to run the Ruby IRB on
I just installed gnome 3 and I added a few extensions, I noticed they
Just installed the android sdk on my macbook pro. I created a virtual device,
Just installed Rails 3.1 rc5 and ActiveAdmin from rails-3-1 branch. Installation went good, and
Just installed snow leopard and Xcode, i downloaded version 5.1.38 from the mysql website
Just installed the upgraded restful_authentication plugin for Rails 3 from https://github.com/Satish/restful-authentication . I'm trying
Just installed Xcode 4 so far so good, except that Apple changed all the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.